I agree that we should be doing whatever we can to spread awareness. Part
of that seems to be correcting misconceptions. I don't know how many times
I've had to explain that log4j-api is basically like slf4j-api on steroids
and is just as much of a facade as SLF4J is.
On 25 June 2016 at 21:11, Rem
Hmm Maybe this was not a very good link...
In general I want to encourage people to write about Log4j 2 though.
I think Log4j 2 is still relatively unknown and we need other people to
help us spread awareness.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure why the
I'm not exactly sure why the author uses the internal JUL LogManager
instead of the standard one (which gets replaced with ours on
initialization anyways).
On 25 June 2016 at 02:21, Remko Popma wrote:
>
> http://javaevangelist.blogspot.jp/2016/06/log4j2-javautillogging-jul-adapter.html?utm_sourc
http://javaevangelist.blogspot.jp/2016/06/log4j2-javautillogging-jul-adapter.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+JavaEvangelistJohnYearysBlog+(Java+Evangelist+John+Yeary's+Blog)&m=1
Sent from my iPhone
---
Chinese article (unknown date, but references 2.0-beta3).
http://www.importnew.com/19467.html
Sent from my iPhone
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...
