Let's consider https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1043 to be a
request for that
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> That seems like a reasonable approach to me. Those appenders should only
> stop when the background thread stops.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Jun 17, 2015, at 12:
That seems like a reasonable approach to me. Those appenders should only stop
when the background thread stops.
Ralph
> On Jun 17, 2015, at 12:52 AM, Mikael Ståldal
> wrote:
>
> Would it make sense to allow AsyncAppender to have dynamically created
> delegate appenders (and not only Appende
Would it make sense to allow AsyncAppender to have dynamically created
delegate appenders (and not only AppenderRefs)? And initialize those
delegate appenders in AsyncAppender's background thread?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Mikael Ståldal
wrote:
> Yes, this is related to an appender hangin
Yes, this is related to an appender hanging or throwing an exception on
start up.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Mikael,
>
> Is this related to an appender hanging or throwing an (unchecked)
> exception on start up?
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Ralph Goe
Mikael,
Is this related to an appender hanging or throwing an (unchecked) exception
on start up?
Gary
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> The Appenders used by the AsyncAppender are known at configuration time.
> So starting and stopping them in conjunction when the configur
The Appenders used by the AsyncAppender are known at configuration time. So
starting and stopping them in conjunction when the configuration is initialized
makes sense (and makes managing them easier). The Appenders created by the
RoutingAppender are dynamic - the number of them and their confi
I want to create / initializte the delegates of an AsyncAppender
asynchronously, to protect the application from exceptions and delays in
delegate appender initialization. Is that possible with routing appender?
(See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1043 )
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:25
You could have a routing appender as the delegate of an async appender.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Mikael Ståldal
wrote:
> Is is possible to have the delegate(s) of AsyncAppender created
> dynamically, just like the delegates of RoutingAppender?
>
> --
> [image: MagineTV]
>
> *Mikael Stå
Is is possible to have the delegate(s) of AsyncAppender created
dynamically, just like the delegates of RoutingAppender?
--
[image: MagineTV]
*Mikael Ståldal*
Senior backend developer
*Magine TV*
mikael.stal...@magine.com
Regeringsgatan 25 | 111 53 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
P
