pec authors and I
won't continue an argument of this point. We'll have to agree to disagree and
a decision will have to be made about who's point of view is going to work best
for the EnhancedHTMLAppender. Obviously I think mine will work better, but the
final decision isn't up to me
At 01:26 PM 9/13/2004, Steve Mactaggart wrote:
I agree with all of that comment, but I would refer to the previous emails
about making and keeping the base styles very basic.
I was thinking of defining styles for the default font, alternating lines,
and styles for each level.
I understand the discu
>
> >If the defaults are clearly defined, then it is simple to
> override those
> >properties.
>
> That is simply not true. Let me give you an example:
>
> Assume that the following CSS rule is *embedded* in the output of
> EnhancedHTMLAppender. The embedded
At 07:46 PM 9/10/2004, Jacob Kjome wrote:
If the defaults are clearly defined, then it is simple to override those
properties.
That is simply not true. Let me give you an example:
Assume that the following CSS rule is *embedded* in the output of
EnhancedHTMLAppender. The embedded rules are what
Quoting Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Steve,
>
> At 02:31 AM 9/8/2004, you wrote:
> >Long time no speak,
> >
> >I've been very slack on this front and as it seems that 1.3 is gathering
> >steam to get released I hope to get the Enhanc
Hi Steve,
At 02:31 AM 9/8/2004, you wrote:
Long time no speak,
I've been very slack on this front and as it seems that 1.3 is gathering
steam to get released I hope to get the EnhancedHTMLAppender completed in
the next week.
After leaving it so long, and having to re-read the discussion to
Long time no speak,
I've been very slack on this front and as it seems that 1.3 is gathering
steam to get released I hope to get the EnhancedHTMLAppender completed in
the next week.
After leaving it so long, and having to re-read the discussion to work out
where we were up to I think its ti
At 02:51 PM 6/4/2004 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Jacob,
I very much like the solution you outlined.
Happy to hear :-)
As you mentioned, my observation also show that the order in which
styles are listed has its importance.
For example, in the following sample, the output will be white as the
embedded styl
Hi Jacob,
I very much like the solution you outlined.
As you mentioned, my observation also show that the order in which
styles are listed has its importance.
For example, in the following sample, the output will be white as the
embedded style listed last overrides the external style sheet listed
f
At 02:18 AM 6/4/2004, Steve Mactaggart wrote:
I like the idea, but what about when reading the logs off line, it would
loose all formatting and possibly be hard to read.
That is a very important observation. The output should be readable
when the user is off line. More on this later.
It also means
I have to imagine that the style stuff for EnhancedHTMLLayout would be
pretty sparse. The structure of the document will be pretty
standard. In-lining styles (meaning ) in this case would
be tantamount to using tags given the sheer amount of markup
written. However, one can add a style for
>
> You probably know it already but it may be useful to mention it here.
> An external style sheet can be specified using the tag.
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_howto.asp
> The user can specify the location of the external CSS file as an
> argument to EnhancedHTMLLayout. The
At 04:48 AM 5/29/2004, you wrote:
Ceki,
>
> Is the diff file against CVS head or was it against log4j 1.2.8?
It should be against the CVS head.
Indeed, the patch worked without a hitch.
>
> I think instead of manually setting colors, font and what
> have you, we
> could use a CSS file. A default v
Ceki,
>
> Is the diff file against CVS head or was it against log4j 1.2.8?
It should be against the CVS head.
>
> I think instead of manually setting colors, font and what
> have you, we
> could use a CSS file. A default version could be placed on
> the Logging
> Services project's web-si
sorry for the
delay in responding.
At 03:34 AM 5/18/2004, Steve Mactaggart wrote:
I have got an initial version of the updated HTMLAppender created.
I have called it the EnhancedHTMLAppender at the moment, so you can run both
and see the differences, but I hope to replace the existing one once th
I have got an initial version of the updated HTMLAppender created.
I have called it the EnhancedHTMLAppender at the moment, so you can run both
and see the differences, but I hope to replace the existing one once this is
completed.
This Appender requires a change to some other classes, and these
16 matches
Mail list logo
