patibility, but since it's log4j-core (not api)
>>> we agreed that this is acceptable here.
>>>
>>> The reason it's a separate super interface is that I plan to have other
>>> Encoder implementations (perhaps user-specified) for binary logging.
>>>
It does break binary compatibility, but since it's log4j-core (not api) we
>>>> agreed that this is acceptable here.
>>>>
>>>> The reason it's a separate super interface is that I plan to have other
>>>> Encoder implementations (perhaps user-spec
it's a separate super interface is that I plan to have other
>> Encoder implementations (perhaps user-specified) for binary logging.
>>
>> The Jira may have more details:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1274
>> <https://issue
erhaps user-specified) for binary logging.
>>>
>>> The Jira may have more details:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1274
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 2016/04/13, at 5:30, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>
hone
>
> On 2016/04/13, at 5:30, Gary Gregory <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Now that Layout extends Encoder and Encoder is new in 2.6, why not fold
>> Encoder in Layout?
>>
>> Doesn't Layout extending a new type (Encoder) break BC anyw
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1274
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 2016/04/13, at 5:30, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> Now that Layout extends Encoder and Encoder is new in 2.6, why not fold
>> Encoder in Layout?
>>
>> Doesn'
o have other
> Encoder implementations (perhaps user-specified) for binary logging.
>
> The Jira may have more details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1274
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2016/04/13, at 5:30, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Now that Layout ext
ls:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1274
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2016/04/13, at 5:30, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Now that Layout extends Encoder and Encoder is new in 2.6, why not fold
> Encoder in Layout?
>
> Doesn't Layout extending a new type (En
Now that Layout extends Encoder and Encoder is new in 2.6, why not fold
Encoder in Layout?
Doesn't Layout extending a new type (Encoder) break BC anyway?
Gary
--
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.co