Good question. Someone needs to start a vote thread. But will we be voting
for only our top pick, top 3 or 4 or what?
Ralph
On May 15, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> So... what are we doing here?
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> > On May 1
So... what are we doing here?
Gary
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> > On May 14, 2014, at 4:04 AM, "Christian Grobmeier"
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 14 May 2014, at 8:52, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes the Jira outlines a process that was proposed by Christian in the
> Jira
I don't know if my vote counts, but I would go with ACBG
On May 13, 2014 5:36 PM, "Ralph Goers" wrote:
> I don’t recall that we had “rules”. Just that we were going to vote.
>
> Ralph
>
> On May 13, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> STV: ABEF
> (I do not like D at all FWIW)
> We can onl
I'm not sure this moves the ball forward, we need to follow the procedure
we initially presented...
Gary
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I like:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12605823/apache-log4j-2.png
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/att
and use a higher resolution.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Von:* Luigi Alice [mailto:luigi.al...@persis.de]
>>> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 13. Mai 2014 14:49
>>> *An:* Log4J Developers List
>>> *Betreff:* AW: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
&
> On May 14, 2014, at 4:04 AM, "Christian Grobmeier"
> wrote:
>
>> On 14 May 2014, at 8:52, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> Yes the Jira outlines a process that was proposed by Christian in the Jira
>> issue. However, that would be equivalent to someone creating an issue and
>> saying that a new fe
I recall that usually Jim or Sam is very helpful with setting up the
voting tool for such things.
Maybe somebody else involved in Infra is willing to help as well.
Somebody got time to ask there?
On 13 May 2014, at 22:00, Ralph Goers wrote:
Then we could do it manually. You can find some docu
neat vector graphic?
On 13 May 2014 08:13, Luigi Alice wrote:
Perhaps we can change the color and use a higher resolution.
*Von:* Luigi Alice [mailto:luigi.al...@persis.de]
*Gesendet:* Dienstag, 13. Mai 2014 14:49
*An:* Log4J Developers List
*Betreff:* AW: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
Pick this one
wrote:
The jira ticket outlines a process IIRC.
Gary
Original message
From: Ralph Goers
Date:05/13/2014 17:36 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
I don’t recall that we had “rules”. Just that we were going to
vote.
Ralph
On May 13, 2014
:
> The jira ticket outlines a process IIRC.
>
> Gary
>
>
> Original message
> From: Ralph Goers
> Date:05/13/2014 17:36 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
>
> I don’t recall that we had “rules”. Just th
Perhaps we can change the color and use a higher resolution.
Von: Luigi Alice [mailto:luigi.al...@persis.de]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Mai 2014 14:49
An: Log4J Developers List
Betreff: AW: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
Pick this one… ☺
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616371
The jira ticket outlines a process IIRC.
Gary
Original message From: Ralph Goers
Date:05/13/2014 17:36 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
I don’t recall that we had “rules”. Just that we were going to vote.
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at
I don’t recall that we had “rules”. Just that we were going to vote.
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> STV: ABEF
> (I do not like D at all FWIW)
> We can only vote on the "lettered" logos?
>
> We did not have STV in our orginal rules IIRC.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, May
And we can calculate the winner using http://paul-lockett.co.uk/stv.html or
http://www.openstv.org/
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I tried to set up Steve, but it's pretty undocumented and requires an
> elaborate Apache set-up to work.
>
>
> On 13 May 2014 13:42, R
STV: ABEF
(I do not like D at all FWIW)
We can only vote on the "lettered" logos?
We did not have STV in our orginal rules IIRC.
Gary
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Nobody is voting... :-|
> I've given them a letter (
> https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominatio
Then we could do it manually. You can find some documentation on STV at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I tried to set up Steve, but it's pretty undocumented and requires an
> elaborate Apache set-up to work.
>
>
I tried to set up Steve, but it's pretty undocumented and requires an
elaborate Apache set-up to work.
On 13 May 2014 13:42, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I was hoping we could use Steve and vote as we do for board members (STV).
> That way one vote would find the winner. They way we are doing it I do
I was hoping we could use Steve and vote as we do for board members (STV).
That way one vote would find the winner. They way we are doing it I don’t
think any one logo is going to get immediate consensus so we would need
multiple votes to get a majority for the winner.
Ralph
On May 13, 2014,
And so... what? Do we vote on this ML or edit the wiki?
Gary
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Round 2!
>
>
> On 13 May 2014 08:24, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> I thought we already did round 1 of voting?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
I we are using STV then my vote is
DABIEFHGC
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Are we voting here or on the wiki. If here my vote is for “D”.
>
> Ralph
>
> On May 13, 2014, at 5:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
>
>> Nobody is voting... :-|
>> I've given them a letter
>> (h
That's right, round 2.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Round 2!
>
>
> On 13 May 2014 08:24, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> I thought we already did round 1 of voting?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
>>
>>> Nobody is voting... :-|
>>> I'v
Are we voting here or on the wiki. If here my vote is for “D”.
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 5:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Nobody is voting... :-|
> I've given them a letter
> (https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations ), so we can vote by
> saying A: +1 or B: +1, etc.
> Hope this he
lopers List
> *Betreff:* AW: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
>
>
>
> Pick this one… J
>
>
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616371/log4J2_Orange_Gr%C3%BCn.png
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Remko Popma [mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com ]
> *Gesendet:* Die
Round 2!
On 13 May 2014 08:24, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I thought we already did round 1 of voting?
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
>
>> Nobody is voting... :-|
>> I've given them a letter (
>> https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations ), so we can vot
Pick this one… ☺
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616371/log4J2_Orange_Gr%C3%BCn.png
Von: Remko Popma [mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Mai 2014 14:47
An: Log4J Developers List
Betreff: Re: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
Nobody is voting... :-|
I've given t
I thought we already did round 1 of voting?
Gary
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Nobody is voting... :-|
> I've given them a letter (
> https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations ), so we can vote by
> saying A: +1 or B: +1, etc.
> Hope this helps.
>
> But if no
Nobody is voting... :-|
I've given them a letter (
https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations ), so we can vote by
saying A: +1 or B: +1, etc.
Hope this helps.
But if nobody votes then perhaps Ralph should just pick one... :-P
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I li
I like:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12605823/apache-log4j-2.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12598627/log4j-designmantic.com-5.PNG
On 6 May 2014 08:13, Remko Popma wrote:
> I've updated https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations :
> separated
I've updated https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations :
separated the logos that have at least 2 supporters from the others.
I've also given each logo a letter so people can vote for a logo on this
mailing list.
29 matches
Mail list logo
