[ANNOUNCEMENT] Log4j 2.6.1 released

The Apache Log4j 2 team is pleased to announce the Log4j 2.6.1 release! Apache log4j is a well known framework for logging application behavior. Log4j 2 is an upgrade to Log4j that provides significant improvements over its predecessor, Log4j 1.x, and provides many other modern features

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > Thank you for doing the release, Ralph! > > I didn't see an announcement email, or did I miss it? > It's customary to wait 24 hours before making an announcement to let the files propagate through the mirrors. Gary

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

Thank you for doing the release, Ralph! I didn't see an announcement email, or did I miss it? Sent from my iPhone > On 2016/06/09, at 12:44, Ralph Goers wrote: > > The vote has passed with binding +1 votes from Remko Popma, Matt Sicker, Gary > Gregory and Ralph

[VOTE][RESULT] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

The vote has passed with binding +1 votes from Remko Popma, Matt Sicker, Gary Gregory and Ralph Goers. Leon Finker also cast a +1 vote. Thanks to all who voted. I will continue on with the release process. Ralph

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

My +1 Ralph > On Jun 5, 2016, at 6:55 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.6.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [] +1, re

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_79\jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252 OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows" Gary On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> w

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

anyone else seen this? On a second try, the whole build passed. I'll continue my review tonight. Gary On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.6.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > Please downlo

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

2016 at 17:12, Leon Finker <leon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> we've hit LOG4J2-1409 issue >>> >>> On 2016-06-05 21:55 (-0400), Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>> wrote: >>> > This is a vote to release Log4j 2

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

2.5 and yet here it stands in 2.6.x. Should be > really removed eventually. > > On 6 June 2016 at 17:12, Leon Finker <leon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> we've hit LOG4J2-1409 issue >> >> On 2016-06-05 21:55 (-0400), Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

n 2016-06-05 21:55 (-0400), Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.6.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > > [] +1,

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

+1 we've hit LOG4J2-1409 issue On 2016-06-05 21:55 (-0400), Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.6.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

;> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >> wrote: >> >>> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.6.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 >>> project. >>> >>> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

;mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.6.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [] +1, release the artifacts > [] -1, don't release because... > &

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

lextreme.com> > wrote: > >> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.6.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 >> project. >> >> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. >> [] +1, release the artifacts >> [] -1, don't release because... >> >&

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

+1 Remko On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.6.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [] +1, release the art

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

On Jun 5, 2016 5:45 PM, "Remko Popma" wrote: > > That's great. Thanks, Ralph! +1 Gary > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2016/06/06, at 9:34, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> The release is in progress. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Jun 5, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Ralph

[VOTE] Log4j 2.6.1 rc1

This is a vote to release Log4j 2.6.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 project. Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. [] +1, release the artifacts [] -1, don't release because... The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). All votes

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

That's great. Thanks, Ralph! Sent from my iPhone > On 2016/06/06, at 9:34, Ralph Goers wrote: > > The release is in progress. > > Ralph > >> On Jun 5, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> Actually, my fix broke a different

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

The release is in progress. Ralph > On Jun 5, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Actually, my fix broke a different unit test. Fixing that one. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 5, 2016, at 8:53 AM, Gary Gregory

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

I created the fix and tested it. The test works when I run it standalone but fails when I run all tests. I am not sure why. One way or another I plan to create the release today. Ralph > On Jun 5, 2016, at 4:23 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > Is the footer being written

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

Is the footer being written twice in LOG4J2-1405 a showstopper for 2.6.1? If this is an easy fix I'd say go for it, but otherwise perhaps it makes sense to release what's in master now. Especially LOG4J2-1409

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

Actually, nevermind. I know how to do it. Ralph > On Jun 3, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I can make on from the jpeg tonight or tomorrow. AFK. > > Gary > > On Jun 3, 2016 1:26 PM, "Ralph Goers"

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

I can make on from the jpeg tonight or tomorrow. AFK. Gary On Jun 3, 2016 1:26 PM, "Ralph Goers" wrote: > A png. > > Ralph > > On Jun 3, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Ralph Goers

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

A png. Ralph > On Jun 3, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > Do we have one of the standard logo? I can do that before I generate the site. >

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Do we have one of the standard logo? I can do that before I generate the > site. > I'm sorry one of what? Gary > > Ralph > > On Jun 3, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Fri,

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

Updated a few of the things from LOG4J2-1394. There are four things remaining, and three of them have to do with generated html rather than the manual. The other part is documenting the ReusableMessage classes in the messages manual page. On 3 June 2016 at 13:50, Ralph Goers

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

Do we have one of the standard logo? I can do that before I generate the site. Ralph > On Jun 3, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3,

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > >> Gary, can you modify another logo for 2.6.1. Just pick the one in the >> chart preceding the one for 2.6. >> > > Sure. > See

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

I have been assigned looking-after-sick-2-yo duties tomorrow, so more may not be in the cards. If anyone likes web apps, volunteers for checking out LOG4J2-1405 would be great! :-) On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Ralph Goers

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

Gary, can you modify another logo for 2.6.1. Just pick the one in the chart preceding the one for 2.6. Ralph > On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Thanks Remko. Just remember that “tonight” or “tomorrow morning” translates > into 12-24 hrs from

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

Thanks Remko. Just remember that “tonight” or “tomorrow morning” translates into 12-24 hrs from now. So if you have more you want to do when you get up you have some time. Ralph > On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:03 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > I fixed two critical issues

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

I am testing applying the keyword 'final' where currently missing (three ivars, a bunch of params and lvars) but I have not pushed to master yet. Gary On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > I fixed two critical issues introduced by 2.6. > It would be great

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

I fixed two critical issues introduced by 2.6. It would be great if Matt can take a look at LOG4J2-1394 (I did a bit but there's still quite a few remaining). Not sure if LOG4J2-1405 was introduced by 2.6 since the user upgraded from 2.3.

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Are there any other fixes that have to go in? I am thinking I will start > the release tonight or tomorrow morning. > Good to go from my POV. Gary > > Ralph > > > On Jun 1, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Ralph Goers

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

LOG4J2-1394 should be fixed. I'll try to handle that this afternoon. On 3 June 2016 at 10:57, Ralph Goers wrote: > Are there any other fixes that have to go in? I am thinking I will start > the release tonight or tomorrow morning. > > Ralph > > > On Jun 1, 2016, at

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

Are there any other fixes that have to go in? I am thinking I will start the release tonight or tomorrow morning. Ralph > On Jun 1, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > I just fixed LOGJ2-1402. I would also like to modify RenameAction to use > java.nio.file

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

+1 Sounds reasonable On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > +1 for 2.6.1. Plus, we have website fixes, too. > > On 1 June 2016 at 18:01, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> >> On Jun 1, 2016 2:57 PM, "Ralph Goers" wrote:

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

+1 for 2.6.1. Plus, we have website fixes, too. On 1 June 2016 at 18:01, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2016 2:57 PM, "Ralph Goers" wrote: > > > > I just fixed LOGJ2-1402. I would also like to modify RenameAction to > use java.nio.file to

Re: Log4j 2.6.1

On Jun 1, 2016 2:57 PM, "Ralph Goers" wrote: > > I just fixed LOGJ2-1402. I would also like to modify RenameAction to use java.nio.file to rename and delete so that we can get better logging out of them. Ultimately, I want to address LOG4J2-1180 to have the rolling

Log4j 2.6.1

I just fixed LOGJ2-1402. I would also like to modify RenameAction to use java.nio.file to rename and delete so that we can get better logging out of them. Ultimately, I want to address LOG4J2-1180 to have the rolling file appender write directly into the “rollover files” as this is apparently