Re: NoSQL 3rd party updates

2014-09-24 Thread Gary Gregory
It feels like we need an integration test to start/stop a MongoDB instance... same for the other guy. Gary On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > There's several tests for any NoSQL implementation following the general > contract of how they're all supposed to work. The MongoDB d

Re: NoSQL 3rd party updates

2014-09-24 Thread Matt Sicker
There's several tests for any NoSQL implementation following the general contract of how they're all supposed to work. The MongoDB driver should be safe to update, but the Lightcouch one is still rather new, so I wouldn't trust a new version without perusing their changelog. On 24 September 2014 2

Re: NoSQL 3rd party updates

2014-09-24 Thread Gary Gregory
Matt, This could wait for 2.2 unless you have time to test. Right now, it seems there is no way to test this from the build. Gary On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > If you have time to check this for 2.1 that would be nice. > > Gary > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Mat

Re: NoSQL 3rd party updates

2014-09-13 Thread Gary Gregory
If you have time to check this for 2.1 that would be nice. Gary On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Whoops, sort of forgot. It would be safe to upgrade EclipseLink. I'm > assuming Mongo would work, but I wouldn't do that blindly. I don't know > enough about lightcouch to know

Re: NoSQL 3rd party updates

2014-09-11 Thread Gary Gregory
I updated the Eclipse JPA jar earlier today... Nick, are you around still? How can we unit test our MongoDB and CouchDB code? Gary On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Whoops, sort of forgot. It would be safe to upgrade EclipseLink. I'm > assuming Mongo would work, but I woul

Re: NoSQL 3rd party updates

2014-09-11 Thread Matt Sicker
Whoops, sort of forgot. It would be safe to upgrade EclipseLink. I'm assuming Mongo would work, but I wouldn't do that blindly. I don't know enough about lightcouch to know if it's a safe upgrade, so I'll take a more close look at their changelog. On 11 September 2014 10:08, Gary Gregory wrote:

Re: NoSQL 3rd party updates

2014-09-11 Thread Gary Gregory
ping? Gary On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > I'll try to take a better look into this sometime this week. I'm pretty > sure the JPA things should be good. I'll take a look at the unit tests for > log4j-nosql a bit better to see if we can safely upgrade. > > > On 2 September 2

Re: NoSQL 3rd party updates

2014-09-03 Thread Matt Sicker
I'll try to take a better look into this sometime this week. I'm pretty sure the JPA things should be good. I'll take a look at the unit tests for log4j-nosql a bit better to see if we can safely upgrade. On 2 September 2014 09:24, Matt Sicker wrote: > The JPA/EclipseLink update should be fine

Re: NoSQL 3rd party updates

2014-09-02 Thread Matt Sicker
The JPA/EclipseLink update should be fine to test. There are a bunch of tests involving JPA and HSQL or H2 (can't remember which). As to the NoSQL ones, other than integration testing, so far we can only mock them. With something like Gora or Hazelcast or something more generic, it's possible to u

NoSQL 3rd party updates

2014-09-02 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All and Nick: I see that these updates could be done: mongo-java-driver 2.12.3 <- 2.11.2 lightcouch 0.1.3 <- 0.0.6 org.eclipse.persistence.jpa 2.5.2 <- 2.5.1 But our unit tests do not seem very deep in NoSQL land. Can Nick or some else set up for better testing confirm that these updates are