Re: Quick note about Marker construction and null.

2014-04-24 Thread Bruce Brouwer
It sounds reasonable to me to require a non-null name. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > There's no point in using a null-named Marker, right? Many methods don't > allow for a null argument for Marker name, but the constructor does. I'm > going to change this. > > -- > Matt

Quick note about Marker construction and null.

2014-04-23 Thread Matt Sicker
There's no point in using a null-named Marker, right? Many methods don't allow for a null argument for Marker name, but the constructor does. I'm going to change this. -- Matt Sicker