:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 6/17/2007 8:29 PM
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: LogFilePatternReceiver & notification of completion
yep, I think that's a required step for all receivers.
Thanks Scott.
On 18/06/2007, at 1:22 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
> Sure--fyi, I vaguely re
t: Re: LogFilePatternReceiver & notification of completion
isn't it the reverse? I need a synchronous receiver. The current
behaviour is async. ?
Can I apply my change?
On 18/06/2007, at 3:34 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
Sounds like an AsyncReceiver (essentially what Chainsaw is doing
under the c
PROTECTED]
www.comotivsystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 6/17/2007 2:42 PM
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: LogFilePatternReceiver & notification of completion
isn't it the reverse? I need a synchronous receiver. Th
isn't it the reverse? I need a synchronous receiver. The current
behaviour is async. ?
Can I apply my change?
On 18/06/2007, at 3:34 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
Sounds like an AsyncReceiver (essentially what Chainsaw is doing
under the covers).
Scott Deboy
COMOTIV SYSTEMS
111 SW Columbia Str
Sounds like an AsyncReceiver (essentially what Chainsaw is doing under the
covers).
Scott Deboy
COMOTIV SYSTEMS
111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950
Portland, OR 97201
Telephone: 503.224.7496
Cell: 503.997.1367
Fax:503.222.0185
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.comotivsystems.com
