Re: JUL class name

2014-09-08 Thread Gary Gregory
Enjoy :-) G On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Yes actually. Last day off. > > > On Monday, 8 September 2014, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Monday, 8 September 2014, Gary Gregory >>> wrote: >>> For == tes

Re: JUL class name

2014-09-08 Thread Matt Sicker
Yes actually. Last day off. On Monday, 8 September 2014, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matt Sicker > wrote: > >> >> >> On Monday, 8 September 2014, Gary Gregory > > wrote: >> >>> For == tests, a map seems better. >>> >>> >>> Gary >>> >> I agree. >> > > Do you have time?

Re: JUL class name

2014-09-08 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > On Monday, 8 September 2014, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> For == tests, a map seems better. >> >> >> Gary >> > I agree. > Do you have time? Gary > > >> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Monday, 8 Sept

Re: JUL class name

2014-09-08 Thread Matt Sicker
On Monday, 8 September 2014, Gary Gregory wrote: > For == tests, a map seems better. > > > Gary > I agree. > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Matt Sicker > wrote: > >> >> >> On Monday, 8 September 2014, Gary Gregory > > wrote: >> >>> Also, why not use maps to implement the conversions? >>> >>

Re: JUL class name

2014-09-08 Thread Gary Gregory
For == tests, a map seems better. Gary On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > On Monday, 8 September 2014, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Also, why not use maps to implement the conversions? >> >> For standard level lookups? Because the ranges are for custom level > support. Plus,

Re: JUL class name

2014-09-08 Thread Matt Sicker
On Monday, 8 September 2014, Gary Gregory wrote: > Also, why not use maps to implement the conversions? > > For standard level lookups? Because the ranges are for custom level support. Plus, the name change sounds good. Just can't make it a TypeConverter sadly. > Gary > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at

Re: JUL class name

2014-09-08 Thread Gary Gregory
Also, why not use maps to implement the conversions? Gary On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > WRT org.apache.logging.log4j.jul.Levels > > I think these would be better names: > > Levels -> org.apache.logging.log4j.jul.LevelConverter > - toJulLevel > - toLog4jLevel > > Gary >