Re: TimeBasedRollingPolicy behaviour

2005-09-01 Thread Jacob Kjome
Quoting K Sunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks for responding to my clarification. > > I tried as you suggested. > I removed setActiveFileName. > It worked by appending the date with the fileName. > > I have one more clarification: > Is it possible to have a activeFileName with just name and no

Re: TimeBasedRollingPolicy behaviour

2005-09-01 Thread K Sunil
Thanks for responding to my clarification. I tried as you suggested. I removed setActiveFileName. It worked by appending the date with the fileName. I have one more clarification: Is it possible to have a activeFileName with just name and no date appended and the rolled up files must

Re: TImeBasedRollingPolicy behaviour

2005-08-31 Thread Curt Arnold
On Aug 31, 2005, at 7:35 AM, K Sunil wrote: Hi All, I am using Log4j 1.3 alpha build for the development. In this build, I tried to use TimeBasedRollingPolicy, set below properties TimeBasedRollingPolicy f = new TimeBasedRollingPolicy(); f.setActiveF

TImeBasedRollingPolicy behaviour

2005-08-31 Thread K Sunil
Hi All,     I am using Log4j 1.3 alpha build for the development.   In this build, I tried to use TimeBasedRollingPolicy, set