Re: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail

2006-11-21 Thread Yoav Shapira
seems a bit overly-bureaucratic to require a faxed/mailed CLA of one-time contributors (resulting in a corresponding reduction in individual contributions). Scott Deboy -Original Message- From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 11/19/2006 8:59 PM To: Log4J Developers List Subj

Re: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail

2006-11-21 Thread Elias Ross
--- Thomas Raddatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The first time it hurts. ;-) > > Thanks Scott. That was the missing piece of the puzzle. I haven't taken a look at the patch, but I do know people are more receptive if the patch is broken into files (to be easily viewed). As a point of discussio

Re: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail

2006-11-21 Thread Thomas Raddatz
, November 20, 2006 11:11 AM To: Log4J Developers List Subject: Re: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail Probably I am too blind but there is no "Create a new attachment" link below the "Summary:" field. The only links I see on the submit page

Re: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail

2006-11-21 Thread Yoav Shapira
---Original Message- From: Thomas Raddatz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:11 AM To: Log4J Developers List Subject: Re: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail Probably I am too blind but there is no "Create a new attachment" link below

Re: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail

2006-11-21 Thread Thomas Raddatz
Probably I am too blind but there is no "Create a new attachment" link below the "Summary:" field. The only links I see on the submit page are: Component: Platform: OS: Priority: Severity: Assign To: Keywords: (Links listed from top/left to bottom/right corner) There are

RE: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail

2006-11-21 Thread Scott Deboy
t Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.comotivsystems.com -Original Message- From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 11/20/2006 8:26 PM To: Log4J Developers List Subject: Re: XMLSocketHubRece

code contributions and CLA's (Was Re: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail)

2006-11-21 Thread Curt Arnold
On Nov 20, 2006, at 11:26 PM, Scott Deboy wrote: I agree that using a bug tracking system is a useful way to track (and not lose) contributions - however, I can't find anything mentioning 'scope' requiring a CLA, in ASF or LS docs. This particular commit is very limited in scope, and has n

Re: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail

2006-11-21 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Click the "Create a new attachment" link under the Summary field, and follow the directions there. Yoav On 11/20/06, Thomas Raddatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Curt, How do I attach a file to a bug report? Do I have to use the "URL:" field? http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?p

Re: XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail

2006-11-21 Thread Thomas Raddatz
Elias, > I haven't taken a look at the patch, but I do know people are more receptive > if the patch is broken into files (to be easily viewed). I will respect that for the future. Sorry for any inconveniences. Thomas Raddatz. Elias Ross schrieb: --- Thomas Raddatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

XMLSocketHubReceiver available - answer to Scott Deboy e-mail

2006-11-19 Thread Thomas Raddatz
Hi Scott, Thank you so much for your fast response to my posting to "log4net-user@logging.apache.org". I would gladly contribute the XMLSocketHubReceiver to the log4j project. That is why I did post to log4net-user, isn't it? ;-) It was really great if you could add the receiver to the proje