Re: Yet another release candidate

2005-08-22 Thread Mark Womack
I set up my environment to use jdk 1.3.1_16 and all of the jars listed in the new build.properties.sample. I did a build locally (rc4+) and then diff'd the result with Curt's rc4. Only differences of note (beyond the javadoc timestamps) were: 1) The build.xml changes to fix the jmx issue Curt

RE: Yet another release candidate

2005-08-22 Thread Mark Womack
t; To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Yet another release candidate > > I've posted an log4j 1.2.12 release candidate log4j-1.2.12rc4 to > http://people.apache.org/~carnold/logging-log4j-1.2.12rc4.zip and > http://people.apache.org/~carnold/logging-log4j-1.2.12rc4.tar.gz. > Thi

Yet another release candidate

2005-08-19 Thread Curt Arnold
I've posted an log4j 1.2.12 release candidate log4j-1.2.12rc4 to http://people.apache.org/~carnold/logging-log4j-1.2.12rc4.zip and http://people.apache.org/~carnold/logging-log4j-1.2.12rc4.tar.gz. This is not explicitly not an official release and should not be used for anything other than