Re: log4jMini/log4jME

2005-12-01 Thread Yoav Shapira
ni project moving again? Any suggestions? > > Ralph > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yoav > Shapira > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:16 > To: Log4J Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: log4jMin

Re: log4jMini/log4jME

2005-12-01 Thread Curt Arnold
I've seen log4jMini or log4jME but haven't investigated them and have been curious about their status, deviations from log4j proper, etc. Can anyone give a quick overview or a reference. Should we add them to the Gump builds? ---

Re: log4jMini/log4jME

2005-12-01 Thread Yoav Shapira
Ralph, Thanks for contributing these changes and reporting them. You can open a new Bugzilla issue (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla), selecting log4j as the product and describing your work. You can then attach diff files comparing your patch to the existing files: use the diff -u format. Than

log4jMini/log4jME

2005-12-01 Thread Ralph Curtis
I hope this is the right place to ask this question... I checked out the latest version (v1_3alpha_6) for this J2ME (Foundation/J9) log4j implementation. Found it doesn't build. I fixed the build problems and would like to get the changes checked in. I am not a contributor to date. Can someone dir