JSR47?

2001-07-10 Thread Mark Womack
Has anyone heard about any movement or changes regarding JSR47? -Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JSR47?

2001-07-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Mark, I am in contact with the JSR47 specification lead. I'll let the group know as soon as concrete information becomes available. Ceki At 10:55 10.07.2001 -0700, Mark Womack wrote: >Has anyone heard about any movement or changes regarding JSR47? > >-Mark > >--

Re: using default configuration with the AppServer classes

2001-07-10 Thread Ernie Parker
Paul, You were correct. My AppServerCategory had: private static CategoryFactory factory = new new AppServerCategoryFactory(); When my AppServerCategory getInstance() method was called, factory was still null. It appears I had a problem with the order of static initialization. I c

Re: JSR47?

2001-07-10 Thread Chris Barlock
At the risk of starting another email campaign, JSR47 will go into Merlin (JDK 1.4) pretty much as-is. Chris Tivoli Systems Research Triangle Park, NC (919) 254-9964 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Multiple components configuring log4j (Warning - long(ish) post)

2001-07-10 Thread Robert Leftwich
I have a question on the best way to handle configuring log4j when multiple sub-systems/components each are using log4j. For example, if you use Struts and Cactus in addition to your own code then there are 3 different users of log4j that may require specific things to be setup at configuration

RE: a question about the DailyRollingFileAppender

2001-07-10 Thread Amit Vaidya
Kevin, What exactly do you mean by 'the application is running"? I'm using the DailyRollingFileAppender through my standalone java application. So do you mean to say that there is no way that this RollingFileAppender will work if my program is not running at the 'Rolling time instance'?? Regard