Mark Masterson wrote:
> Short answer: I think that you would find that setting the priority at the
> Category level is faster, in terms of absolute performance.
That's what I was assuming for the reasons you mentioned in your
explanation. As for benchmarking.. maybe after I get the product
Mark Masterson wrote:
> In your example, the easiest way to achieve what you're after is to use the
> "Threshold" parameter, common to all Appenders, and set its priority as
> appropriate.
Is it more performant to set the log level via the Appender or via
Categories? Here's my example...
lo
William Jaynes wrote:
>
>>This change might help in some situations. But it is not going to
>>address the Tomcat issue.
>
> But it does. I've made the change it it works.
I also just completed this change, and it works beautifully.
rjw
-
Hi,
I am trying to configure Log4J to log to Syslog. I've tried using both
programatic and configuration file techniques. Below is my simple syslog
test program. It fails to log with an IOException: Connection refused.
I am running syslogd, and, in fact, I can run "logger This is a test"
and
