Re: while we are talking about NDC

2001-06-12 Thread Scott M Stark
ginal Message - From: "Seemantini Godbole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'LOG4J Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:38 PM Subject: RE: while we are talking about NDC > Anders, > > Thanks for pointing out. Yes,

RE: while we are talking about NDC

2001-06-12 Thread Seemantini Godbole
eki's idea about using '%x{server}' instead of inventing new characters for Pattern* classes. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Anders Kristensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 3:28 PM To: LOG4J Users Mailing List Subject: Re: while we are talk

Re: while we are talking about NDC

2001-06-12 Thread Anders Kristensen
This is essentially the same idea that Ceki floated previsouly under the name "Mapped Diagnostic Context" -- a per-Thread String-to-String map: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=98051571516266&w=2 It's a good idea but hasn't been implemented yet (to my knowledge). Cheers, Anders S

while we are talking about NDC

2001-06-12 Thread Seemantini Godbole
Hi all, For last couple of weeks I have been using log4j and is working very well for our logging needs. Ours is a typical J2EE architecture, with JSP, servlets, EJB combination. However, we need some client specific info such as the name of the user who logged in, client ip address, request ty