> Thanks for the reply. I downloaded and started looking at chainsaw2 this
> morning and started to get the feeling the LF5 was now part of it.
> Thanks for confirming that.
LF5 is very popular, we would be negligent in not trying to cater for
features that people use. If we missed anything, pleas
Thanks for the reply. I downloaded and started looking at chainsaw2 this
morning and started to get the feeling the LF5 was now part of it.
Thanks for confirming that.
The new chainsaw does look good and seemed stable in my usage this
morning - well done (I did note a few areas that need a little
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 08:02, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
> Howdy,
> Perhaps we could replace the top chainsaw screenshot with one that is
> readable, i.e. higher resolution? ;)
It is actually hi res, just the image tag width/height has scaled it
down causing distortion. If I left it natural size it woul
Hi,
Did you look into creating a custom filter? I have only played around with
them a little bit, but chapter 6 of Ceki Gulcu's "Complete Log4J Manual"
covers them. To work you will need to be able to identify the class the
LoggingEvent is coming from. If each class has its own logger, you cou
Howdy,
Perhaps we could replace the top chainsaw screenshot with one that is
readable, i.e. higher resolution? ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 4:02 PM
>To: Log4J Users List
>Subje
Not sure if anyone has replied to this one..
LF5 is no longer being actively developed. You might want to consider
Chainsaw v2, which is the effective replacement and enhancement of both
the original Chainsaw, and LF5, and will be included and supported with
log4j1.3, but is production usable righ
Howdy,
The OnlyOnceErrorHandler doesn't do what the original poster wanted at
all. Thanks anyways,
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Augustyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:12 PM
>To: 'Log4J Users List'
>Subject: RE:
You've got the same category defined twice. That is going to be a problem.
Also, try adding an child element to set additivity as follows:
This should cause all messages logged at INFO (and above) to be logged only
via the SCHE
Ok. I took a look at log4j.xml and I didn't find an example of I'm
trying to dohere's my log4j.xml file...if you take a look at
the "Userdefined Categories" you'll notice where I'm using the
additivity="false" value to eliminate logs being sent to the console.
Well, that's what I'm try
ErrorHandlers are about handling errors from within Appenders. I think the
question on the table has to do with a Filter for LoggingEvents. Luckily,
log4j provides a base class for Filters, and a way to configure them. I'm
not aware of one that does what is being asked, however, it doesn't sound
li
Well it looks like jboss is using OnlyOnceErrorHandler
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/index.html
robert
-Original Message-
From: Robert Augustyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:52 PM
To: 'Log4J Users List'
Subject: RE: suppressing messages
Look into
Howdy,
I don't care enough to research myself -- I just wondered if you had a
direct reference, a specific class or method. I guess not, and that's
alright.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Augustyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, Janu
Look into jboss-common-client package.
Best place would be to ask on jboss.org.
robert
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:42 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: suppressing messages
Howdy,
Really? Can you give a specific
Howdy,
Really? Can you give a specific place in their code where they're doing
this?
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Augustyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:31 PM
>To: 'Log4J Users List'
>Subject: RE: suppressing m
Jboss implemented this you may want to look at that.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Raziel Steinmetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: suppressing messages
Hello,
Is there a way to suppress logging messages ? for
example
Pitre,
Look into an log4j.xml in conf of the jboss.
It has examples of what you need.
robert
-Original Message-
From: Tom Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:10 PM
To: 'Log4J Users List'
Subject: RE: Exclude a class from a particular
appender.
I assume
I assume that your Root logger is set to use the CONSOLE appender. That
being the case, you can set the 'additive' parameter of your
com.shawmut.portal.scheduler logger to false. This way, any messages logged
to this logger will NOT be sent to it's parent logger (e.g. Root/CONSOLE) as
well.
Thanks Yoav,
I was afraid that this will be the answer.
While I agree with you that a logging facility shouldn't drop any messages -
but I do believe that specific appenders should have this capabilities (such
as SMTPAppender). It's almost like when you are changing the logging level
from DEBUG
Howdy,
You could write a TriggeringEventEvaluator that keeps a history of
logging events and consults it when deciding whether to pass or fail the
current event.
I'm not aware of other methods currently built-in to log4j, because this
request is against the spirit of logging, which is no dropped
Hello,
Is there a way to suppress logging messages ? for example I setup an SMTP
Appender to email me any error and fatal messages but sometimes the same
error can occur a few times per second and jam my mail box. I'm looking for
a way to set log4j to only send me the first message and then wait X
Hello All-
I'm using Jboss 3.2 and I'm trying to figure out how to exclude a
certain class from the console appender. I have two appender's; a
console appender for ALL my classes and another appender for a specific
package of classes. This package provides scheduling capabilities from
my app
Tried 1.2.8, and I still get the exact same error.
Andy Nguyen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/06/2004 09:55:39 AM
Please respond to "Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:"Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: Problems with DOMConfigurator and WebLogic 6.1 SP4
Thanks
Try file:///home/anguyen/applications/myapp/WEB-INF/classes/log4j.xml
Olli
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:58 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: RE: Problems with DOMConfigurator and WebLogic 6.1 SP4
>
>
>
I don't think that's the case. According to the console output, log4j is
picking up the correct XML config file:
"log4j: Using URL
[file:/home/anguyen/applications/myapp//WEB-INF/classes/log4j.xml] for
automatic log4j configuration."
That message is in the console output when I use -Dlog4j.debu
Thanks, I'll give it a shot.
Andy Nguyen
Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/05/2004 05:27:43 PM
Please respond to "Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:"Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: Problems with DOMConfigurator and WebLogic 6.1 SP4
First check if u
25 matches
Mail list logo
