Taner,
In order to use a custom level in the LevelMatchFilter (or pretty much
anywhere), you need to specify the name of your custom class. For example,
instead of
use
Note that the class name specified needs to be fully qualified, so add the
package info after the #.
Simo
In log4j a popular way to name loggers is to name them by software
component. This can be performed by statically instantiating a logger in
each class, as follows:
package com.foo;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
public class Bar {
static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(Bar.class);
...
}
At 08:37 AM 3/1/2004 +1100, you wrote:
> One other thing. Has anyone else noticed that when you run "ant chainsaw"
> on the Log4j build that the attempt by Ant to delete the log4j and
chainsaw
> jar files fails if they exist already? I can't figure out why this would
> be. I can delete them jus
> It would seem that the most intuitive way to configure this would be to
> configure two different appenders for the Root logger, with each
> appender
> having its own message priority level and layout. However, as I
> understand
> it the priority level can only be set by logger, not appender.
>
Hi all,
I'm new to log4j. I know what I want to achieve, but the most intuitive way
of achieving it doesn't seem possible with the current release of log4j.
The design goals I have are as follows:
1. Name loggers by software component. ie statically instantiate a logger
in each class,
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 16:51, Jacob Kjome wrote:
> Wanted to let people know that I updated the install-chainsaw.xml to use
> the logging-log4j CVS module rather than jakarta-log4j, have it use the
> up-to-date 2.0.8 Jakarta-oro package, and added a commented out stub of
> listing all needed dep
Folks
My first question to the list - and I admit I am not a log4j pro:-) - I did
look around quite a bit
before posting...
Basically, the requirement is very simple:
We are using J2EE infrastructure (jsp, middle tier code accessing data in
the
database) to render UI. During the UI rendering the
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 10:29, Drapeau, Tom wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I recently installed log4j on a FreeBSD system and have been playing
> with various options trying to improve the performance of the
> SMTPAppender.
>
> I have attached my log4j.properties file below.
>
> The SyslogAppender is runn
I agree, log files stored in a non-XML format should be viewable in Chainsaw v2.
I contributed a Receiver which provides Log4J (and Chainsaw v2) the ability to process
events stored in a logfile written using an arbitrary format (PatternLayout).
In order to use this receiver, follow the instruct
