I apologize if this has been asked before. I couldn't find it in FAQ.
I was wondering if there is a way to configure log4j so it doesn't buffer
STDOUT, so error and info messages all come out in the order they are
produced.
Thanks,
-ramin
You might find this article of interest, if you want to write your own...
Develop an Asynchronous Logging Framework using log4j with JMS and
WebSphere MQ
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0207_barcia/barcia.html
--
Tom Goetze
Thomas, Thanks for the sugges
Thomas, Thanks for the suggestions. I am worried that extending
JMSAppender is not going to work because the physical messages would
need to be in an MQ format, not a JMS format. The messages headers will
be different even if the payloads are agnostic. But since I know you
can go from a JMS mess
Hi,
The other post had a couple of good ideas. The probability of us
including a provider-specific appender implementation is in the log4j
core is slim. In add-on/contrib modules, the probability is higher, but
you'd have to write it, submit it to us (with the appropriate copyright
transfer), and
Hi,
If I were to set log4j.appender.MyAppender.immediateFlush = FALSE, whats the size of
the log messages buffered before it is outputted to the file ?? Can I set it ?
I understand that few messages may get lost, but I feel this would prevent heavy disk
activity as David pointed out.
Any sugge
Does any one have an idea how i can set authentication for my smtp server to
send mails.Iam attempting to send emails for every error generated in the
JBOSS and hence have set the respective log4j.xml entry as under.
Afaik no. I use a standard log4j setup which logs to file and console
and I do not use any flushing. Maybe you could try it in a simple
context like a "hello world" program.
regards,
Martin Olsson
Schuhmacher, Bret wrote:
Is Log4J buffered? I have the following statements:
myLog.fatal("a fatal
