Re: Logging - What good is it ?

2007-06-04 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jun 4, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Steve Souza wrote: <> Not sure who controls the website, but that direction should be updated on the site as currently it indicates log4j 1.3 is the future. Not everyone is on this mailing list. A total reworking of the online content is in-progress. All the

Re: Logging - What good is it ?

2007-06-04 Thread Steve Souza
Thanks for you help by the way :) On 6/4/07, Steve Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <> Not sure who controls the website, but that direction should be updated on the site as currently it indicates log4j 1.3 is the future. Not everyone is on this mailing list. <> Where is the sandbox code kep

Re: Logging - What good is it ?

2007-06-04 Thread Steve Souza
<> Not sure who controls the website, but that direction should be updated on the site as currently it indicates log4j 1.3 is the future. Not everyone is on this mailing list. <> Where is the sandbox code kept? Also, will the release you are referring too be available in this link: http://archi

Re: Logging - What good is it ?

2007-06-04 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jun 4, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Steve Souza wrote: I am interested in using a Log4j 1.3 SocketReceiver for JAMon to receive LoggingEvents. I have a couple questions 1) Per the following link I see the first release of log4j 1.3 was in 2004, and it still hasn't had a beta let alone been releas

Re: Logging - What good is it ?

2007-06-04 Thread Steve Souza
I am interested in using a Log4j 1.3 SocketReceiver for JAMon to receive LoggingEvents. I have a couple questions 1) Per the following link I see the first release of log4j 1.3 was in 2004, and it still hasn't had a beta let alone been released. Are there any plans on releasing 1.3? Does anyon

RE: Logging - What good is it ?

2007-06-04 Thread Slaughter, Stan
Yep - but 1 - Time Synched backups are pain when you need to see what is going on in production "right now" And 2 - That means getting different departments involved inorder to create backups and/or network shares and all the attendent securing of the shares (adding and removing allowed users

RE: Logging - What good is it ?

2007-06-04 Thread Scott Deboy
You could have your IT folks rsync the log file regularly to a location that you have access to , and then use whatever tools you want for slicing & dicing the log file (including Chainsaw). You can also use VFSLogFilePatternReceiver with Chainsaw to access the log file from its original locati

RE: Logging - What good is it ?

2007-06-04 Thread Slaughter, Stan
Looks Nice. I'll be out of pocket this week - but I'll be giving it a run when I get back. I have never understand the sparcity of web enabled tools for log4j. A project that is sponsored by an organization that also produces TOMCAT. I guess all the effort has gone into Chainsaw, which is really

Re: File and Console Appenders question

2007-06-04 Thread James Stauffer
1. No. 2,3. http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/manual.html 4. Attach two appenders to the one logger. 5. No. On 6/1/07, untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello there, I am using an init servlet to load my log4j.properties file during app start up... public class Log4jInitServlet extends Http

Re: Threadlogging

2007-06-04 Thread James Stauffer
This was just discussed. See http://www.nabble.com/DailyRollingFileAppender-for-multiple-threads-tf3752882.html#a1084 On 5/30/07, Daniel Abrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can i configure Log4j that i get for eacht java-thread a log file? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.

Re: Proper startup order?

2007-06-04 Thread James Stauffer
Is it possible that log4j is being configured twice because AFAIK configuration doesn't happen in the background? Also log4j config messages aren't generally sent to your logs unless you have log4j debugging turned on and use a ConsoleAppender. On 5/26/07, Rich Adili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: