Re: Wikipedia entry for log4j has link to log4cxx that says "outdated" (again)

2007-10-15 Thread Curt Arnold
On Oct 15, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Wilfong, Paul wrote: A while back I noticed that the Wikipedia entry for log4j had links to various C/C++ logging facilities, including log4cxx. At the time they all had "(outdated)" next to them. log4cxx didn't look outdated to me, so I 1. changed the entry to

Re: Suppressing passwords in the log files?

2007-10-15 Thread James A. N. Stauffer
You could use a filter to surpress the message any message that has "password" in it. On 10/15/07, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Is there any way to suppress passwords' display in the log files? > I am concerned that log files will be accessible to various users on > the server, di

Re: Create multiple appenders objects

2007-10-15 Thread Julio S. G.
Great! Now it's working. I've made some changes, like add both appenders to root logger and keep some unusual names but I think that it's what I need. Thanks a lot. Julio On 10/11/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 11, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Julio S. G. wrote: > >> On 10/11/07, Juli

Re: Suppressing passwords in the log files?

2007-10-15 Thread Matthew Kemp
Where are you pulling the passwords from? Are you using an NDC/MDC? If the passwords are logging directly by your application - i.e. something like: logger.debug("password = " + password); Then you should look at changing the log statements. On 10/15/07, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Suppressing passwords in the log files?

2007-10-15 Thread John Smith
Hi, Is there any way to suppress passwords' display in the log files? I am concerned that log files will be accessible to various users on the server, disclosing the application passwords to them. Is there some way to filter the passwords before they are committed to the log file? Thanks, John

Wikipedia entry for log4j has link to log4cxx that says "outdated" (again)

2007-10-15 Thread Wilfong, Paul
A while back I noticed that the Wikipedia entry for log4j had links to various C/C++ logging facilities, including log4cxx. At the time they all had "(outdated)" next to them. log4cxx didn't look outdated to me, so I 1. changed the entry to remove the label, 2. put a question in the wikipedia d