Peter,
I don't have Tomcat installed but I was able to reproduce the problem in a
standalone test using your configuration.
There is a couple of things I found.
First, File appenders have these configuration settings by default:
bufferedIO="true" and immediateFlush="false".
This means that mess
Peter,
I understand your frustration.
Let me try to help.
I'm at work now, so please understand if I am unable to reply to your messages
immediately.
First, I tried to do what you did originally (in your March 25th post), which
is a root logger and a named logger, each having a different lev
I continue to struggle achieving basic logging results under my web app
under tomcat. It seemed to work months ago, but when I upgraded to the
latest beta logging failed.
I returned to examine my config and failed to solve the problem. I emailed
this list about this and I received no response. Aft
The approach I did is documented (perhaps poorly) at
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/configuration.html in the section
titled configuring filters. Adding the level to the appender-ref may not be
documented. That was missed when the feature was added.
Ralph
On Apr 23, 2013, at 5:50
I am having a very difficult time learning the configuration system and am
very frustrated by the documentation. I had hoped to learn the system well
enough to possibly contribute to the project with respect to a tutorial or
other documentation, but I've concluded that I can no longer spend so much
I see. I understood Peter's question differently. Let's hope one of our answers
solves his problem! :-)
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013/04/24, at 9:46, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Your trace file will also contain info and above. From Peter's question I
> understood him to mean he only wants events at t
Your trace file will also contain info and above. From Peter's question I
understood him to mean he only wants events at that level. We don't have a
filter that does that specifically so I used two threshold filters to do it.
Ralph
On Apr 23, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
> I don't thi
Actually, in reconsidering your question the solution is going to be a bit
messy. I haven't tried it but you should be able to do:
The first threshold filter will discard events with a logging level higher than
what your want. The second discards events lowe
I don't think the docs have an example yet. This one worked for me:
%d %-5p %c{1.} [%t] %m %ex%n
%d %-5p %c{1.} [%t] %m %ex%n
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013/04/24, at 9:22, Peter DePasquale wrot
Can you point me to an example in the documentation? I didn't see anything
like that in there, that I recall...
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> You cannot have two root loggers but you can have multiple appender-refs
> on them. Each appender-ref can have its own log level
You cannot have two root loggers but you can have multiple appender-refs on
them. Each appender-ref can have its own log level so I believe you get the
same behavior that you are looking for.
Ralph
On Apr 23, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Peter DePasquale wrote:
> Is it possible to use two root loggers,
Is it possible to use two root loggers, one to capture trace and one to
capture errors (or more generally, two different levels)? If so, can
someone please provide a simple config example? Thanks.
--
Peter J. DePasquale, Ph.D.
Department of Computer Science
The College of New Jersey
(e) depasqua
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nick Williams
wrote:
> Lacking any responses, I'll chime in:
>
> I didn't know log4cxx existed. The only Cxx code I write is Java+Native. With
> that said, now that I know it exists, I will investigate using it in my
> native code; I'm not sure.
>
> I'd love to t
Lacking any responses, I'll chime in:
I didn't know log4cxx existed. The only Cxx code I write is Java+Native. With
that said, now that I know it exists, I will investigate using it in my native
code; I'm not sure.
I'd love to try to help some, but I simply don't have time right now. I'm in
th
14 matches
Mail list logo
