I can, yes.
Nick
On Jul 26, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The approach currently implemented sounds good to me.
>
> Nick, can you document the appender's behavior to avoid further confusion?
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> On Jul 26, 2013, at 14:32, Nick Williams
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, thi
I quickly reviewed the code and as far as I can tell:
* only the following places in Log4j-2 will create a permanent thread in
addition to your application threads: AsyncLoggers, AsyncAppenders,
o.a.l.l.c.net.SocketServer, o.a.l.l.c.net.UDPSocketServer and
o.a.l.l.c.helpers.*CachedClock
* synchr