2.8.1 release and LOG4J2-1804

2017-02-26 Thread Shlomi Hazan
Hi guys, The broken rolling file appender - LOG4J2-1804 (sorry for duplicating it with LOG4J2-1821) has a very wide effect on our log collection across many servers, and it would be a great deal of effort to update and test all the configuration files to walk around the issue. My question is - ho

Re: 2.8.1 release and LOG4J2-1804

2017-02-26 Thread Apache
Well, this was the last bug that I saw that was critical to get fixed so I might start the release today - unless something gets in my way. Ralph > On Feb 26, 2017, at 3:18 AM, Shlomi Hazan wrote: > > Hi guys, > > The broken rolling file appender - LOG4J2-1804 (sorry for duplicating it > with

Re: 2.8.1 release and LOG4J2-1804

2017-02-26 Thread Apache
Oh - we do have to finalize how to get the new Scala project on the web site but that actually doesn’t have to be part of the Log4j release. Ralph > On Feb 26, 2017, at 9:21 AM, Apache wrote: > > Well, this was the last bug that I saw that was critical to get fixed so I > might start the rele

Re: 2.8.1 release and LOG4J2-1804

2017-02-26 Thread Shlomi Hazan
Great!!! You're the man! What does it usually take until artifacts are propagated to maven central ? On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Apache wrote: > Oh - we do have to finalize how to get the new Scala project on the web > site but that actually doesn’t have to be part of the Log4j release. > >

Re: 2.8.1 release and LOG4J2-1804

2017-02-26 Thread Matt Sicker
After a release candidate is created, it's up for review for at least 72 hours to be voted on. After that, if there are no issues with the release candidate, that candidate is promoted to Maven Central (which can take up to a day to fully mirror across all of Maven Central) and made available to do