Re: Apache chainsaw

2017-04-07 Thread Matt Sicker
Could be a neat opportunity for using JavaFX or something. On 7 April 2017 at 21:25, Ralph Goers wrote: > Brett and Robert, are you suggesting you would want to get involved in > improving Chainsaw if it moved to git? > > Ralph > > > On Apr 7, 2017, at 6:42 PM, Brett Randall wrote: > > > > +1 f

Re: Apache chainsaw

2017-04-07 Thread Ralph Goers
Brett and Robert, are you suggesting you would want to get involved in improving Chainsaw if it moved to git? Ralph > On Apr 7, 2017, at 6:42 PM, Brett Randall wrote: > > +1 for migration to Git. > > On 6 April 2017 at 07:44, Matt Sicker wrote: > >> We can probably do that, though usually w

Re: Apache chainsaw

2017-04-07 Thread Brett Randall
+1 for migration to Git. On 6 April 2017 at 07:44, Matt Sicker wrote: > We can probably do that, though usually we like to do a 72 hour grace > period to make sure there are no objections before migrating repositories. > > On 6 April 2017 at 02:01, Robert Lu wrote: > > > Can chainsaw migrate to