Log4j2 Question migration.

2020-02-18 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hello, I'm going from log4j to log4j2. Now I had in log4j package import for log4j.helpers.AbsoluteTimeDateFormat, log4j.helpers.ISO8601DateFormat and log4j.helpers.OptionConverter. In log4j2 in which packages can I find this management? -

Re: Log4j2 Question migration.

2020-02-18 Thread EDMONDO SENA
; 2’s plugin system handles some of that for you. > > Ralph > > > On Feb 18, 2020, at 1:31 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm going from log4j to log4j2. Now I had in log4j package import for > > log4j.helpers.AbsoluteTimeDateForma

Re: Log4j2 Question migration.

2020-02-18 Thread EDMONDO SENA
that for you. > > Ralph > > > On Feb 18, 2020, at 1:31 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm going from log4j to log4j2. Now I had in log4j package import for > > log4j.helpers.AbsoluteTimeDateFormat, log4j.helpers.ISO8601D

LogLog.setQuietMode

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi, In log4j1 there was the possibility to use this functionality. Is there a function in log4j2 that replaced it? Kind regards. //Edmondo. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional comm

getAppender

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
how to getAppender from logger? we have a lot of code to get the appender in the project: logger.getAppender(appenderName). I read the api for the log4j2, I couldn't find any. How can I fix it? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-use

Re: LogLog.setQuietMode

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 04:10 EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > In log4j1 there was the possibility to use this functionality. > > Is there a function in log4j2 that replaced it? > > > > Kind regards. > > //Edmondo. > > > > > > -

Re: getAppender

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
’s plenty of examples of how that is done in the tests. > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 04:23 EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > how to getAppender from logger? we have a lot of code to get the appender > > in the project: logger.getAppender(appenderName). I read the api for the &

org.apache.log4j.Category

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi Everybody, org.apache.log4j.Category is not available in Log4j2. How can we use it in Log4j2? Must we change all our code? Can you tell me as implement it in Log4j2? Kind regards. //Edmondo. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-u

Re: getAppender

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Ok, but they are the API not examples On 2020/02/19 14:29:41, Gary Gregory wrote: > Please see > https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-core/apidocs/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/config/Configuration.html#getAppender-java.lang.String- > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 09:27

extends RollingFileAppender

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi, it seems that is not possible to extend it in log4j2, because apache have made it a final class in log4j2. In earlier version of log4j was possible easily extends it. This migration steps also doesn't specify how to move this functionality to log4j2. Can you write me how fix it? Thanks.

Re: org.apache.log4j.Category

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
We use the java code not properties files in this case. On 2020/02/19 15:03:16, Matt Sicker wrote: > See these pages: > > http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/migration.html > > http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/compatibility.html > > > On Wed, Feb 1

Re: org.apache.log4j.Category

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
I've checked it but nothing is reported for Category log1.x migration, On 2020/02/19 15:05:29, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > We use the java code not properties files in this case. > > > On 2020/02/19 15:03:16, Matt Sicker wrote: > > See these pages: > > > >

Re: extends RollingFileAppender

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
mizations to Log4j 2 is > not the correct approach. > > Yes, RollingFileAppender is final. You would have to tell us what you were > trying to customize before we can tell you how to do it. > > Ralph > > > On Feb 19, 2020, at 8:00 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > &g

Re: org.apache.log4j.Category

2020-02-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
rovide > compatibility for those classes. > > Ralph > > > On Feb 19, 2020, at 7:41 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > Hi Everybody, > > > > org.apache.log4j.Category is not available in Log4j2. > > > > How can we use it in Log4j2? > > Must we

Re: org.apache.log4j.Category

2020-02-20 Thread EDMONDO SENA
; Ralph > > > On Feb 19, 2020, at 8:27 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > No Ralph because for security problem we have to pass to Log4j2. > > Log4j1 will be out. > > > > > > On 2020/02/19 15:20:44, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> I you have code that

Syslog4j

2020-02-20 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi, Syslog4j is compatible with Log4j 2? Kind regards. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org

StatusLogger Urgent

2020-02-20 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi, In log4j2, is there an equivalent of log4j 1.x' LogLogfor internal logging purposes? StatusLogger is contained in org.apache.logging.log4j.status.StatusLogger? Is StatusLogger import contained in log4j-1.2-ap

Re: Syslog4j

2020-02-20 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Sorry it means that now is it impossible to use syslog4j with log4j 2? What do you mean out of the box? //Edmondo. On 2020/02/20 15:01:25, Matt Sicker wrote: > I’d guess no, but Log4j2 comes with syslog appenders out of the box now. > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 04:30 EDMONDO SE

Re: Syslog4j

2020-02-20 Thread EDMONDO SENA
> See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders.html#SyslogAppender > <http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders.html#SyslogAppender> > > Ralph > > > On Feb 20, 2020, at 8:05 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > Sorry it means that now is it imp

Re: Syslog4j

2020-02-20 Thread EDMONDO SENA
20 15:23:58, Matt Sicker wrote: > What did you customize about that old class? We likely already support the > same features you added in the v2 class. Can you tell us a little more > about your use case? > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:22 EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > &

Re: Syslog4j

2020-02-21 Thread EDMONDO SENA
write log events to syslog Log4j 2 already supports that. > > Ralph > > > On Feb 20, 2020, at 8:30 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > That class has been created to face to a bug in a syslog4j library related > > to the handling of identity when more Appenders are

Re: Syslog4j

2020-02-21 Thread EDMONDO SENA
act > as a no-op when you use a Log4j 2 configuration file. > > Again, what are you trying to do with syslog4j that Log4j 2’s SocketAppender > doesn’t support? > > Ralph > > > > > On Feb 21, 2020, at 3:57 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > >

PatternLayout Log4j2

2020-02-27 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi Everybody, In log4j1.x I was using the PatternLayout(String Pattern) namely: - setLayout(new PatternLayout("%d %-lp - %m"). Now I didn't understand the equivalent of making this regular expression in log4j2. Can you help me understand better? --

Re: PatternLayout Log4j2

2020-02-27 Thread EDMONDO SENA
ean by “regular expression” with regards to the > PatternLayout as it doesn’t use regular expressions. Have you tried the same > pattern? My guess is it should do the same thing Log4j 1 did. > > Ralph > > > On Feb 27, 2020, at 2:25 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > &

Re: PatternLayout Log4j2

2020-02-27 Thread EDMONDO SENA
y are you doing this programmatically instead of using a > configuration file? > > Ralph > > > On Feb 27, 2020, at 8:25 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > > > I've used: > > > > Call -> > > final Builder builder2 = newSyslogAppender

Re: PatternLayout Log4j2

2020-02-27 Thread EDMONDO SENA
I saw it but not everything in that examples is clear to me... On 2020/02/27 15:33:56, Matt Sicker wrote: > http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/customconfig.html > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 09:32 EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > > Is it possible to

Log4j2 with File Properties org.apache.http - Urgent

2020-03-13 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hello, we had a properties file (log4j) that used http apache. The properties file (log4j) is the following: 1) log4j.logger.httpclient.wire=ERROR 2) log4j.logger.org.apache.http.wire = ERROR 3) log4j.logger.org.apache.http.impl.conn = ERROR 4) log4j.logger.org.apache.http.impl.client = ERROR 5)

Re: Log4j2 with File Properties org.apache.http - Urgent

2020-03-16 Thread EDMONDO SENA
FILE: On 2020/03/13 16:43:11, Ralph Goers wrote: > Please supply the Log4j2 XML configuration that works. > > Ralph > > > On Mar 13, 2020, at 9:39 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > we had a properties file (log4j) that used http

Re: Log4j2 with File Properties org.apache.http - Urgent

2020-03-16 Thread EDMONDO SENA
We've the same problem with: # SFTP server log log4j.category.com.maverick=WARN,A1 log4j.additivity.com.maverick=false # FTP server log log4j.category.org.apache.ftpserver=ERROR,A1,stdout log4j.additivity.org.apache.ftpserver=false Kind regards. On 2020/03/13 16:39:01, EDMONDO

log4j.configDebug in Log4j 2

2020-03-17 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hello, I need know if the configuration below for log4j As it has been migrated in Log4j 2? In particular using log4j.configDebug? Thanks. //Edmondo. CONFIG_DEBUG_KEY public static final String CONFIG_DEBUG_KEY Deprecated. Use DEBUG_KEY instead. Defining this value makes log4j components prin

Re: getAppender

2020-03-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
intln("appender = " + appender); Can you help me? //Edmondo. On 2020/02/19 15:31:53, Ralph Goers wrote: > LoggerContext context = LogManager.getContext(“false”); > FileAppender appender = context.getConfiguration().getAppender("info"); > > Ralph > > > > On

Re: getAppender

2020-03-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
But null is the output ... On 2020/03/19 15:09:56, Ralph Goers wrote: > If it compiles than your casting is correct. > > Ralph > > > On Mar 19, 2020, at 5:41 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > Hi Ralph, > > > > The example below that you mentione

Re: getAppender

2020-03-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
On 2020/03/19 15:15:39, Ralph Goers wrote: > Then it didn’t find an appender with that name in the configuration. > > Ralph > > > On Mar 19, 2020, at 8:13 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > But null is the output ... > > > > >

Re: getAppender

2020-03-19 Thread EDMONDO SENA
appender named "LoggerLog4jDebug". The appender is probably > "LoggerLog4jDebugAppender"? > > On Thursday, March 19, 2020, 11:19:35 AM EDT, EDMONDO SENA > wrote: > > The code is: > try { >                 Conf

Re: Log4j2 with File Properties org.apache.http - Urgent

2020-03-23 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Any News about it? Regards. //Edmondo. On 2020/03/16 13:37:49, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > We've the same problem with: > > # SFTP server log > log4j.category.com.maverick=WARN,A1 > log4j.additivity.com.maverick=false > > > > # FTP server log > log4j.cat

setUseStructuredData log4j

2020-03-24 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi, what is the correspective in log4j2 for setUseStructuredData ? Regards. //Edmondo. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org

Re: setUseStructuredData log4j

2020-03-24 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Can you send the link about it? On 2020/03/24 13:46:44, Matt Sicker wrote: > There’s an entire set of structured data classes now for further > customization in the API. Otherwise, you want to use one of the syslog > layouts, too. > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:49 EDMO

removeAllAppenders() Log4j2

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hello, Is there a similar functionality for Log4j2 that remove All appenders for Loggers? Kind regards. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging

Re: removeAllAppenders() Log4j2

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
> | > > > is that helpful? > One of the answers does indicate that removing all appenders might not be > necessary, perhaps you need smarter filtering? > > > On Wednesday, March 25, 2020, 8:34:56 AM EDT, EDMONDO SENA > wrote: > >

Re: removeAllAppenders() Log4j2

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
> On Wednesday, March 25, 2020, 8:34:56 AM EDT, EDMONDO SENA > wrote: > > Hello, > > Is there a similar functionality for Log4j2 that remove All appenders for > Loggers? > Kind regards. > > ---

Re: removeAllAppenders() Log4j2

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
45 AM EDT, EDMONDO SENA > wrote: > > > When you close or switch off our system we've to remove all appenders. > In log4j this instruction was possible! > > > On 2020/03/25 12:59:30, Doug Wegscheid wrote: > >  However: from > >https://logging.ap

loggerConfig.getAppenderRefs().clear()

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Why this instruction goes in UnsupportedOperationException? List value = loggerConfig.getAppenderRefs(); value.clear(); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-

Re: removeAllAppenders() Log4j2

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
eing said, you are welcome to try the #clearAppenders(). > On Wednesday, March 25, 2020, 9:16:47 AM EDT, EDMONDO SENA > wrote: > > > Sorry but my question is: > Is possible to use in some way removeAllAppenders? > Why this instruction has been deleted? > > > O

Re: loggerConfig.getAppenderRefs().clear()

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Can you explain me how can i do it? Regards. On 2020/03/25 14:18:03, Doug Wegscheid wrote: > you are trying to clear the list of appenderRefs. Are you trying to call > clearAppenders() instead of clear()? > > On Wednesday, March 25, 2020, 10:03:27 AM EDT, EDMONDO SE

Re: loggerConfig.getAppenderRefs().clear()

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
is not public, so that won't > work. > There is probably a way to do what you want, if you can tell us why you need > to clear the appenders. > > On Wednesday, March 25, 2020, 10:23:38 AM EDT, EDMONDO SENA > wrote: > > > Can you explain me how can i do

Re: loggerConfig.getAppenderRefs().clear()

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Can you explain me this behaviour? Map appenders = config.getAppenders(); appenders.clear();*** WORKING *** Map loggers = config.getLoggers(); loggers.clear();*** GOES IN EXCEPTION DOESN'T WORK!! On 2020/03/25 14:41:30, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > In order to

Re: loggerConfig.getAppenderRefs().clear()

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
e appender a solution? > Do the external appenders come and go, or do we know ahead of time if they > are available? > > > > On Wednesday, March 25, 2020, 10:41:33 AM EDT, EDMONDO SENA > wrote: > > In order to disable local logging when the external log

Re: loggerConfig.getAppenderRefs().clear()

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
'd recommend > avoiding the use of an inline script (JavaScript or Groovy) unless > absolutely necessary as that's likely the slowest routing mechanism > (though you could always benchmark that). > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 09:58, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > > &

Re: removeAllAppenders() Log4j2

2020-03-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
t how to accomplish that” where the > requirement is not something like “remove all appenders”, but is the reason > WHY you need to remove all the appenders. > > Ralph > > > On Mar 25, 2020, at 7:09 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > > >

Java.lang.LinkageError

2020-04-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi Everybody, I'm using log4j 2 with Junit 5 and java 11 with last version of PowerMock, but the following error is showed: "Could not reconfigure jmx java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation : loader org.powermock.core.classloader.javassist.JavassistMockClassLoader, child of 'app

Re: Java.lang.LinkageError

2020-04-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
/830 > [2] > https://github.com/powermock/powermock/issues/830#issuecomment-616243661 > > On 2020-04-29 11:42, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > Hi Everybody, > > > > I'm using log4j 2 with Junit 5 and java 11 with last version of > > PowerMock, but the following error

Re: Java.lang.LinkageError

2020-04-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
ermock/issues/830#issuecomment-616243661 > > On 2020-04-29 11:42, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > Hi Everybody, > > > > I'm using log4j 2 with Junit 5 and java 11 with last version of > > PowerMock, but the following error is showed: >

Re: Java.lang.LinkageError

2020-04-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Sorry, we're using Java 11, Junit 4 e Log4j 2! On 2020/04/29 11:49:03, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > No It is not so! > > PowerMock with java 11 and Log4j old version (1), everything was working. > Adding Log4j 2 We've that problem... > > > > On 2020/04/2

Re: Java.lang.LinkageError

2020-04-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Any question? I'm using Log4j 2.13.0... https://stackanswers.net/questions/powermock-after-log4j2-3-upgrade-could-not-reconfigure-jmx-java-lang-linkageerror On 2020/04/29 11:55:32, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > Sorry, we're using Java 11, Junit 4 e Log4j 2! > > >

Re: Java.lang.LinkageError

2020-04-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
created, specify system property log4j2.disableJmx to true when you start the Java VM. Can you explain me if the problem can be fixed set log4j2.disableJmx=true or using @PowerMockIgnore("Javax.management.* ")? Or something else? On 2020/04/29 12:07:06, EDMONDO SENA wrote: >

Re: Java.lang.LinkageError

2020-04-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
tell. It > doesn’t even compile above 8. > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 07:17 EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > In API Document is reported this phrase: > > > > Enabling JMX > > JMX support is enabled by default. When Log4j initializes, the > > StatusLogger, ContextS

Re: Java.lang.LinkageError

2020-04-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
I repeat, we've done some tests and with java 11, Junit 4 and Log4j 1 everything has worked well. The only difference is log4j -> log4j 2.13 and we've this problem. Can you suggest us what's the workaround? Kind regards. On 2020/04/29 13:32:17, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > Matt

Re: Java.lang.LinkageError

2020-04-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
onfigure PowerMock to ignore the log4j2 JMX > classes. There’s also a system property in log4j2 to disable JMX which is > worth a try. > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:34 EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > I repeat, we've done some tests and with java 11, Junit 4 and Log4j 1

Re: Java.lang.LinkageError

2020-04-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Matt, last question: Before for log4j 1 the JMX wasn't enabled for default? On 2020/04/29 14:30:12, Matt Sicker wrote: > Yes, I mean the system property. I don't know much about PowerMock, > though I never mock loggers. > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 08:52, EDMONDO SENA

Encryption

2020-05-07 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi all, Does log4j2 use internal encryption algorithms? Kind regards. //Edmondo. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org

DefaultRolloverStrategy max=0 - Problem?

2020-05-28 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi Everybody, I've the following file propertes for Log4j2: appender.A1.type = RollingFile appender.A1.name = A1 appender.A1.fileName = Upgrade.log appender.A1.append = true appender.A1.filePattern = Upgrade.log.%i appender.A1.layout.type = PatternLayout appender.A1.layout.pattern = %d %-5p %3

Re: DefaultRolloverStrategy max=0 - Problem?

2020-05-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Good morning, I don't know if a missed answer is that you are thinking about the solution, or that the solution does not exist? On 2020/05/28 11:36:02, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > Hi Everybody, > > I've the following file propertes for Log4j2: > > ap

Re: DefaultRolloverStrategy max=0 - Problem?

2020-05-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
ll at all. So why you're using a > RollingFileAppender? > > Maybe it would be useful to tell what you try to config at all. > > Greetings > Benjamin > > On 2020-05-29 11:40, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > Good morning, > > > > I don't know if a missed answer

Re: AW: DefaultRolloverStrategy max=0 - Problem?

2020-05-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Where is the reason why MinIndex is set minimum to 1? On 2020/05/29 13:41:06, "Groll, Andreas" wrote: > > If you don't want file logging, simply don't use FileAppender. > > ____ > Von: EDMONDO SENA > Gesendet: F

Re: DefaultRolloverStrategy max=0 - Problem?

2020-05-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
> On 2020-05-29 11:54, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > I'm using DefaultRolloverStrategy, I want Roll but no save file > > logging. > > > > > > > > > > On 2020/05/29 09:46:04, Benjamin Asbach wrote: > >> Hi Edmondo, > >> > >&

DefaultRolloverStrategy get Filename

2020-06-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Good Morning, Is there a possibility to get the File name appender with DefaultRolloverStrategy (log4j2)? I have a class that extends DefaultRolloverStrategy and I have seen that only RollingFileAppender has such a possibility. How can I get the appender file name from file.properties by Defa

Re: DefaultRolloverStrategy get Filename

2020-06-25 Thread EDMONDO SENA
get the file name inside a RolloverStrategy? If > that is your question the FileManager is passed to the rollover method and > the FileManager has methods to retrieve the file name. > > Ralph > > > On Jun 25, 2020, at 1:40 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > > > G

Re: DefaultRolloverStrategy get Filename

2020-06-26 Thread EDMONDO SENA
In order to explain better, having inserted some variables into the Strategy, is it possible to somehow take those strategy variables through ad hoc log4j2 methods to see if it matches with the related appender filename ? On 2020/06/25 15:39:59, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > Yes I want it, but t

authapi.jar with Log4j2

2021-10-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Good Morning, authapi.jar is a 3pp library which uses old log4 inside. Is there any way to get authapi.jar to work with log4j 2? What can I do to make them work together? Do I need to download a new authapi.jar version for log4j2? Thanks in advance. Kind regards. //Edmondo. --

Re: authapi.jar with Log4j2

2021-10-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
I have already seen this site but I have not found any answer to my problem. //Edmondo. On 2021/10/29 12:52:55, Gary Gregory wrote: > Edmondo, > > Please see https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/compatibility.html > > Gary > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021, 04:2

Re: authapi.jar with Log4j2

2021-10-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Log4j2 API where they can be processed by > implementations of the Log4j 2 API." > > Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: I > have already seen this site but I have not found any answer to my problem.

Re: authapi.jar with Log4j2

2021-10-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
he other necessary > log4j2 jars, and configure log4j2. > > Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:07 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > it's not that simple one, a thing is to write, one thing is to understand > what to do! Said so

Re: authapi.jar with Log4j2

2021-10-29 Thread EDMONDO SENA
T, Gary Gregory < > garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Make sure the log4j 2 jars are first on the class path and do not include > any log4j 1 jars. > > Gary > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021, 11:18 EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > > it has already been done and it doesn't

Re: authapi.jar with Log4j2

2021-11-03 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Fri, Oct 29, 2021, 11:37 EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > There are no log4j1 jars in classpath. > > > > //Edmondo. > > > > > > > > Il giorno ven 29 ott 2021 alle 17:34 Doug Wegscheid < > > dwegsch...@sbcglobal.net> ha scritto: > > > > &g

Re: authapi.jar with Log4j2

2021-11-10 Thread EDMONDO SENA
n’t have any info to determine what the > problem is. > > Ralph > > > On Nov 3, 2021, at 1:20 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: > > > > Specifically, the LocationInfo constructor that is called by the 3pp lib > does not exist in the new library. > > > > > >

Log4j2 with syslog4j

2022-05-10 Thread EDMONDO SENA
Hi all, I am sending the logs of my subsystems to the SyslogServer but I see that the following exception is raised in TCPSocketManager. Could you help me understand why? I am using log4j 2.17 and syslog0.9.46. The exception is this line 243 of the TCPSocketManager class: 206@SuppressWarnings

Log4j2 with syslog4j

2022-05-10 Thread EDMONDO SENA
? Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:19 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote: Hi all, I am sending the logs of my subsystems to the SyslogServer but I see that the following exception is raised in TCPSocketManager. Could you help me understand why? I am using log4j 2.17 and syslog0.