ject: Re: [INFO] Log4j Release Overview
>
> Hi,
>
> I would suggest, if possible, more frequent snapshot/alpha builds of
> 1.3 branch.
>
> thanks
> Ricardo
>
> Mark Womack wrote:
>
> > The log4j committers recently voted to accept the following releas
Hi,
I would suggest, if possible, more frequent snapshot/alpha builds of
1.3 branch.
thanks
Ricardo
Mark Womack wrote:
The log4j committers recently voted to accept the following release
schedule for future versions of log4j:
1) Release 1.2.11 with JMS build fix. Timeframe is immediate, wit
Thanks, that clears up my confusion...
Srini
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 4:44 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: [INFO] Log4j Release Overview
1.2.9: current production release, released 2 Nov 2004. 1.2.8 with
some
1.2.9: current production release, released 2 Nov 2004. 1.2.8 with
some methods deprecated to anticipate changes in 1.3.
1.2.10: Recalled release. Version number will not be used to avoid
confusion.
1.2.11: 1.2.9 with JMS build fix
1.2.12: 1.2.11 with bug fixes
On May 18, 2005, at 12:41 PM,
level, TRACE, one level below DEBUG.
-Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Chennamaraja, Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:42 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: RE: [INFO] Log4j Release Overview
>
> So what's the difference between
So what's the difference between 1.2.8 and 1.2.12 versions?, are we going back
on version numbers?. I am confused
srini
-Original Message-
From: Mark Womack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:34 PM
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: [INFO]
The log4j committers recently voted to accept the following release schedule
for future versions of log4j:
1) Release 1.2.11 with JMS build fix. Timeframe is immediate, within the
next week.
We should have a build candidate by this Monday, with the release before the
end of the week. Andy Mc
