why not a different renaming schema where only one file, the current to be rolled over file has to be renamed? Josef
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Curt Arnold [mailto:curt.ar...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Curt Arnold Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2012 07:30 An: Log4J Users List Betreff: Re: log4j window size I believe the renaming time can become significant depending on the platform. Unless wrapped in an async appender, this can cause the rollover logic block the caller for an extended period of time. On May 7, 2012, at 9:11 AM, aanjaneya shukla wrote: > Hi, > Is there any specific reason for having a max index at 13 in log4j? Since > we can archive the log files with significant compression we can increase > this. > Thanks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
