George,
Andy McBride reported the following bug in 1.2.12:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36800
and included a patch. Sounds like it might be the same problem. We'll look
at a 1.2.13 to fix it.
-Mark
On 10/6/05, Harp, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just downloaded
Thanks paul
-Original Message-
From: Paul Vaillancourt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:19 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Log4j1.1.12 and TRACE level
This is a known bug; see below...
Original Message
Subject: RE: TRACE location
This is a known bug; see below...
Original Message
Subject: RE: TRACE location information using PatternLayout (Log4j 1.2.12)
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:11:36 +0100
From: Andy McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Log4J Users List ,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'Log4J Users List'
: James Stauffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:01 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Log4j1.1.12 and TRACE level
I think the ? for the method name and class name is probably independant
of using the trace level. It is probably cause by the classes being
compiled
I think the ? for the method name and class name is probably
independant of using the trace level. It is probably cause by the
classes being compiled without debug info.
On 10/6/05, Harp, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just downloaded 1.2.12 and tried to use TRACE level. It printed out
> b
I just downloaded 1.2.12 and tried to use TRACE level. It printed out
but I got a ? mark in both the method name and class name parts of my
pattern layout.
So C and M.
my entire Log4j.xml file is:
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/";>
Is t
