Re: Problem on including DTD entity in a log4j configuration file

2009-11-15 Thread Francis ANDRE
Hi Curt The message is reporting that the content after common.xml is merged is not valid according to the DTD. The DOMConfigurator is less strict than the DTD that specifies (ignoring atypical elements) all the appender elements appear first, then any logger elements, then an optional roo

Re: Problem on including DTD entity in a log4j configuration file

2009-11-15 Thread Curt Arnold
On Nov 15, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Brett Randall wrote: What is in common.xml, and is it valid according to the dtd? Brett The message is reporting that the content after common.xml is merged is not valid according to the DTD. The DOMConfigurator is less strict than the DTD that specifies (i

Re: Problem on including DTD entity in a log4j configuration file

2009-11-15 Thread Brett Randall
What is in common.xml, and is it valid according to the dtd? Brett On 11/16/09, Francis ANDRE wrote: > Hi log4j users > > With the following log4j configuration: > -- > > > ]> > debug='true'> > > &common; > > > ---

Problem on including DTD entity in a log4j configuration file

2009-11-15 Thread Francis ANDRE
Hi log4j users With the following log4j configuration: -- ]> debug='true'> &common; --- I got a XML parsing warning as line 9 column 23 which is exactly the column just after the Any idea?? log4j:WARN Contin