RE: Property Configurator

2004-06-14 Thread Donald Larmee
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Property Configurator Hi Donald Thank you very much for your suggestions. I tried approach # 2 but it did not work. So I tried setting the other attribute ( false ) But no luck I like the Solution #1 too. But I tried it using war file and using jboss-web.xml. jboss

RE: Property Configurator

2004-06-13 Thread Viv Kap
s a benefit; some as, umm, not. > > Anyway, If you wish to force jBoss to behave a bit > more like most J2EE > containers (and therefore avoid the whole property > configurator bit) you can > try the following approaches... > > ASSUMPTIONS: >- You are using jBoss v3.2.

RE: Property Configurator

2004-06-13 Thread Donald Larmee
as a benefit; some as, umm, not. Anyway, If you wish to force jBoss to behave a bit more like most J2EE containers (and therefore avoid the whole property configurator bit) you can try the following approaches... ASSUMPTIONS: - You are using jBoss v3.2.x - You are interested in using log4j

Property Configurator

2004-06-11 Thread Viv Kap
Hi I have a J2EE application and we use log4j for logging. We used log4j.properties files and packaged it in a war under WEB-INF/classes. It all worked fine under Weblogic, Tomcat etc. But now when we migrated to JBoss it has its own log4j.xml file. So our application grabbed it as the first one