RE: JmsReceiver Chainsaw problem

2006-02-02 Thread DeSantis, MJ Mark @ IS (7179)
01, 2006 2:46 PM To: Log4J Users List Subject: Re: JmsReceiver Chainsaw problem To test the theory of jmsAppender being bad, perhaps you can use Hermes to browse the ActiveMQ Topic to see if it's sending the events correctly? http://www.hermesjms.com/ Straightforward to configure, give

Re: JmsReceiver Chainsaw problem

2006-02-01 Thread Paul Smith
pender config that could be causing the problems? Mark -Original Message- From: Scott Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 1:03 PM To: Log4J Users List Subject: RE: JmsReceiver Chainsaw problem Adding an appender to Chainsaw's config is a great way to tell

RE: JmsReceiver Chainsaw problem

2006-02-01 Thread DeSantis, MJ Mark @ IS (7179)
Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 1:03 PM To: Log4J Users List Subject: RE: JmsReceiver Chainsaw problem Adding an appender to Chainsaw's config is a great way to tell whether or not your receiver is receiving events... If you didn't see them in the conso

RE: JmsReceiver Chainsaw problem

2006-02-01 Thread Scott Deboy
3.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.comotivsystems.com -Original Message- From: DeSantis, MJ Mark @ IS (7179) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 2/1/2006 10:49 AM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: RE: JmsReceiver Chainsaw problem Thanks

RE: JmsReceiver Chainsaw problem

2006-02-01 Thread DeSantis, MJ Mark @ IS (7179)
t know if that would work or not but I wanted to give it a try. Anyway, sorry flood this mailing list but I'm desperate. I'd appreciate any help or insight into what I'm messing up on. Thanks again. Mark -Original Message- From: Scott Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sen

RE: JmsReceiver Chainsaw problem

2006-02-01 Thread Scott Deboy
It looks like you need to add a jar containing javax.jms.MessageListener to your classpath. Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.comotivsystem

RE: JMSReceiver - chainsaw

2004-05-25 Thread Paul Smith
> I'm now trying to evaluate the JMSReceiver - someone here > raised the issue that the SocketHubAppender/Receiver is not > password protected, and also there are concerns over the > possible performance impact if lots of people decide to > connect for remote monitoring over a (potentially) slo

RE: JMSReceiver - chainsaw

2004-05-25 Thread Stephen Pain
UK, "'Log4J Users List '" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> x.com.au>cc: Subj

RE: JMSReceiver - chainsaw

2004-05-25 Thread Paul Smith
> Is there a particular reason why the JMSReceiver isn't part of the distribution? Most likely because I create the package for Webstart, and I don't have all the j2ee libraries to compile it, and so ant skips it. I could easily add that, but you would still need those libraries required by the J