RE: Logging every package with a different appender

2004-05-17 Thread Simon Dorrat
need a seperate appender as you originally had. But still make sure you use the fully qualified class name. Hope this helps. Simon > -Original Message- > From: gfdgdf gdfgdf [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 13 May 2004 5:12 PM > To: Log4J Users List > Subject: RE

RE: Logging every package with a different appender

2004-05-13 Thread gfdgdf gdfgdf
Hello, thanks for your answers. Well anybody has experience with xml config files ? My question is about: can I specify a package as name attribute instead of a fully qualified Class name ? my aim is to log every package with a different appender as I said. As you noticed I have created 2 console a

RE: Logging every package with a different appender

2004-05-12 Thread Alan Brown
I don't use the xml configuration file so there may be more errors than the ones I mention. However, with that caveat... You haven't spelt additivity correctly for one... "" Also, you appear to have all of the appenders be ConsoleAppenders so it would seem natural that they'd all be writing to