RE: performance problems IBM JVM

2004-02-03 Thread WJCarpenter
zh> You could turn off logging altogether in the log4j configuration zh> and see what happens. There will still be some overhead compared zh> to removing logging completely, for calls like: zh> Logger.info(calculateOneMillionDigitsOfPi()); Just one caution ... when you "turn off logging altogeth

RE: performance problems IBM JVM

2004-02-03 Thread Hunter, Zellyn
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:10 AM To: Log4J Users List Subject: Re: performance problems IBM JVM We have no idea what the problem is, someone suggested I try ammending log4j settings. We can't remove it totally - it's part of this 3rd party app. All I can do

Re: performance problems IBM JVM

2004-02-03 Thread Pete Stokes
In other words, what happens if you remove it? Robbie -Original Message- From: Pete Stokes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 9:38 AM To: Log4J Users List Subject: Re: performance problems IBM JVM I took out the log4j bits and changed Layout class to SimpleLayo

RE: performance problems IBM JVM

2004-02-03 Thread Robbie Baldock
Are you sure it's log4j which is causing the problem? ;-) In other words, what happens if you remove it? Robbie -Original Message- From: Pete Stokes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 9:38 AM To: Log4J Users List Subject: Re: performance problems IBM JV

Re: performance problems IBM JVM

2004-02-03 Thread Pete Stokes
I took out the log4j bits and changed Layout class to SimpleLayout. Even tried that immediateFlush thing, but to no success! The app on the iSeries performed *slightly* better, i.e. avg mean time for pages = 25sec rather than 27sec. Tomcat gets sub half second consistently. I was really hoping

Re: performance problems IBM JVM

2004-02-02 Thread Tim Williams
s the exception the overhead of creation is still incurred. ..then again I could be wrong :) Tim. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:10 AM Subject: RE: performance problems IBM JV

RE: performance problems IBM JVM

2004-02-02 Thread MarkB
Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2004 12:26:08 PM: > > Log4j computes location information by throwing an exception which is > caught immediately and parsing the stack trace of the exception. > Apparently, creating an exception on AIX is slower than on other platforms. This is a

RE: performance problems IBM JVM

2004-02-02 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Log4j computes location information by throwing an exception which is caught immediately and parsing the stack trace of the exception. Apparently, creating an exception on AIX is slower than on other platforms. As throwing exception is not something one does very frequently, the speed at which

RE: performance problems IBM JVM

2004-02-02 Thread Robbie Baldock
Pete Stokes wrote: > We have massive performance problems on an app running on iSeries > WebSphere 4.0.7 (it uses log4j). The app works perfectly on all other > platforms / servers. > > Someone in the Tomcat users list mentioned that there was talk regarding > a certain log4j attribute when us