Thanks again, Remko. After you detailed explanation everything makes sense
now.
I am using an i7 machine with Ubuntu.
-Becky
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
> When you run PerfTest with these options below you get the same as the
> first test run by PerfTestDriver "Log4j2:
When you run PerfTest with these options below you get the same as the
first test run by PerfTestDriver "Log4j2: Loggers all async (single thread)
":
-Dlog4j.configurationFile=perf3PlainNoLoc.xml
-DLog4jContextSelector=org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.
AsyncLoggerContextSelector
PerfTestDriver
Thank you very much, Remko. So I ran both tests on my machine and got the
numbers below. I am interested in the latency numbers and throughput when
we have one (i.e. threadCount 1 ?) asynchronous logger thread using
disruptor. Can you point me out to these numbers on my results below? Not
sure what
Hi Becky,
The performance test code is a bit messy. Apologies for that.
To answer your questions: I used the longer message for throughput tests,
and the shorter message for latency tests.
PerfTest parameters:
[0] = runner class (like org.apache.logging.log4j.core.
async.perftest.RunLog4j2)
[1] =
Going to guess Remko has something useful to say on this, but since he's in
Japan, just wait a bit for the timezones to make sense.
On 28 March 2014 22:03, Rebecca Ahlvarsson wrote:
> I am trying to run the async performance tests described on the link below
> on my machine.
>
>
> http://loggin
