You might be able to extend FileAppender
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Armin Häberling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Curt Arnold wrote:
>>
>> On May 26, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Armin Häberling wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm facing the following problem. We have a tomcat instance with multiple
>>> w
See...
http://wiki.apache.org/logging-log4j/AppContainerLogging
And avoid Logger Repository Selectors which perform selection based on
Classloader. Use JNDI instead.
Jake
On Wed, 28 May 2008 17:59:33 +0300
Juha Laiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Armin Häberling wrote:
I'm facing the followi
Armin Häberling wrote:
I'm facing the following problem. We have a tomcat instance with
multiple webapps. The apps share many libraries in shared/lib directory,
some of them use log4j and some apache commons-logging.
Currently all the apps log to the same log file, which is suboptimal. We
lik
Curt Arnold wrote:
On May 26, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Armin Häberling wrote:
Hi all,
I'm facing the following problem. We have a tomcat instance with
multiple webapps. The apps share many libraries in shared/lib
directory, some of them use log4j and some apache commons-logging.
Currently all th
On May 26, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Armin Häberling wrote:
Hi all,
I'm facing the following problem. We have a tomcat instance with
multiple webapps. The apps share many libraries in shared/lib
directory, some of them use log4j and some apache commons-logging.
Currently all the apps log to the
Hi all,
I'm facing the following problem. We have a tomcat instance with
multiple webapps. The apps share many libraries in shared/lib directory,
some of them use log4j and some apache commons-logging.
Currently all the apps log to the same log file, which is suboptimal. We
like to have one
rested in each thread creating a thread-specific appender
so that log messages that integrate into the log4j framework can be copied into
that thread-specific log file. We also want this to be configurable to a
certain extent in the log4j.xml file.
These jobs are created dynamically, and there w
I actually don't need it.. Someone else needed it and I just proposed
an idea.
cheers,
Paul
On 10/04/2008, at 5:09 PM, Britton, David wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
Nothing specific that I know of since I wrote that email.
Love to hear how you end up solving this.
Hi Paul --
How were you wa
Paul Smith wrote:
>
> Nothing specific that I know of since I wrote that email.
>
> Love to hear how you end up solving this.
>
Hi Paul --
How were you wanting your per-thread logging to work (high-level)? I do have
something set up now that will work for my application but was wondering a bit
.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
This thread seems to state that there could be some prototype code
for a thread-specific appender that is "out there" some where. Does
anyone have some code that does this right now? Even if it wasn't
pretty, I would be interested in looking at it to
there could be some prototype code for a
thread-specific appender that is "out there" some where. Does anyone have some
code that does this right now? Even if it wasn't pretty, I would be interested
in looking at it to base from.
I know about the following options:
- MDC, then
11 matches
Mail list logo
