Re: Using independent logs at runtime

http://www.nabble.com/Using-independent-logs-at-runtime-tp18678394p18707596.html Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [

Re: Using independent logs at runtime

JethroXT skrev den 28-07-2008 16:31: Surprisingly this resulted in the desired behaviour. I don't quite know why, because there simply aren't any loggers with that names, but I anyhow I get independent loggers, add appenders to them by every node and get single files with only node-relevant dat

Re: Using independent logs at runtime

only node-relevant data. Still there is a bad taste about it, because I don't know why it works and if it will keep working if I add new loggers.. Any ideas? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-independent-logs-at-runtime-tp18678394p18689236.html Sent from the Log4

Re: Using independent logs at runtime

JethroXT skrev den 27-07-2008 19:16: Hi, I have a problem that maybe someone could solve: I have a network consisting of several nodes that all have to log data independently. I don't know the exact number of nodes before runtime, so Loggers (or appenders) have to be created at runtime. Is

Using independent logs at runtime

this is the indended purpose for it anyway. Any ideas? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-independent-logs-at-runtime-tp18678394p18678394.html Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.