g is solid yet, but we are looking at a release of
> > v1.3 before the end of the year, with a beta release around late summer.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Juan Jose Garcia Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:57 PM
> > To: Log4J Users List
> > Subject: RE: log4j 1.3 update needed...
> >
> > Best regards developers:
> >
> > I agree with Hein, in the next release, please make an option to turn
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Jose Garcia Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:57 PM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: RE: log4j 1.3 update needed...
>
> Best regards developers:
>
> I agree with Hein, in the next release, please make an opt
I've read on this list that this output is turn off in CVS already.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Juan Jose Garcia Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:57 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: log4j 1.3 update needed...
Best regards developers:
I agree with
Subject: log4j 1.3 update needed...
Dear log4j developers.
I would really like to encourage you to release a new 1.3 alpha7 or
beta1 something ASAP, as alpha6 has been out there for too long without
any updates; and I don't want to spend my time trying to compile a cvs
version, since it doe
Hein,
I am not a log4j developer, just a log4j user. But I understand
development quite well. We would all like easy to build, friendly CVS,
alpha and beta vesions, but those are not part of the product. Alpha
versions of any software are expected to be a mess... the whole purpose
of their exis
Dear log4j developers.
I would really like to encourage you to release a new 1.3 alpha7 or
beta1 something ASAP, as alpha6 has been out there for too long without
any updates; and I don't want to spend my time trying to compile a cvs
version, since it does not appear to be straight forward with ma
