Re: log4j window size

2012-05-10 Thread Christian Grobmeier
--Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Curt Arnold [mailto:curt.ar...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Curt Arnold > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2012 07:30 > An: Log4J Users List > Betreff: Re: log4j window size > > I believe the renaming time can become significant depending on the platfo

AW: log4j window size

2012-05-10 Thread Stadelmann Josef
: Re: log4j window size I believe the renaming time can become significant depending on the platform. Unless wrapped in an async appender, this can cause the rollover logic block the caller for an extended period of time. On May 7, 2012, at 9:11 AM, aanjaneya shukla wrote: > Hi, > Is the

Re: log4j window size

2012-05-09 Thread Curt Arnold
I believe the renaming time can become significant depending on the platform. Unless wrapped in an async appender, this can cause the rollover logic block the caller for an extended period of time. On May 7, 2012, at 9:11 AM, aanjaneya shukla wrote: > Hi, > Is there any specific reason for hav

log4j window size

2012-05-07 Thread aanjaneya shukla
Hi, Is there any specific reason for having a max index at 13 in log4j? Since we can archive the log files with significant compression we can increase this. Thanks