[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-233) Support .NET 4.0 including Client Profile

2011-08-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13088319#comment-13088319 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-233: Nathaniel and Markus, since both of you

svn commit: r1159943 - /logging/log4net/trunk/src/AssemblyInfo.cs

2011-08-20 Thread bodewig
Author: bodewig Date: Sun Aug 21 04:58:57 2011 New Revision: 1159943 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1159943&view=rev Log: set AssemblyTitle properly for the builds targeting 4.0 and Client Profiles Modified: logging/log4net/trunk/src/AssemblyInfo.cs Modified: logging/log4net/trunk/src

Compilation Symbols

2011-08-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, before I started to modifiy things for 4.0 and client profile the NAnt build was setting a compilation symbol for the "family" like "NET", "NETCF", "MONO" and one for the specific version "NET_1_1", "NET_2_0" and so on. Also the conditional compilation sections seem to not assume NET_2_0

Re: ADO.NET Appender and FX 4.0

2011-08-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-20, Roy Chastain wrote: >> I should add that NAnt.exe.config contains >> >> and seems to need it. This may complicate things even further. > See this http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd409253.aspx Yes, I knew that, I should have elaborated more. > My gut says that thi

ANNOUNCEMENT] Welcome Stefan Bodewig to the Logging PMC

2011-08-20 Thread Curt Arnold
Please welcome Stefan Bodewig to the Logging Project Management Committee (PMC). Stefan is an Apache Software Foundation member, PMC Chair for Gump, and member of the Ant, Commons, Incubator, and Jakarta PMCs. Stefan has volunteered to assist in a release march for log4net and is expected to be

RE: ADO.NET Appender and FX 4.0

2011-08-20 Thread Roy Chastain
>I should add that NAnt.exe.config contains > >and seems to need it. This may complicate things even further. See this http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd409253.aspx My gut says that this setting is a BAD thing. 1) - It is a RUNTIME not COMPILE time setting. If code for legacy se