Re: Release testing

2011-10-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-10-07, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > I have not found sha1 files. They seem to be standard on most > projects, so my guess is you don't want them. Right? The 1.2.10 release didn't have them, so I didn't create any (it would still be trivial to add .sha1s if anybody wants them). > I have n

Release testing (was: Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1)

2011-10-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi folks, I have checked the site, the content of the files (oldkey, newkey, source), the tag and everything looks good to me. I have not found sha1 files. They seem to be standard on most projects, so my guess is you don't want them. Right? I have not tested if test are running, because i am a

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1

2011-10-07 Thread Dominik Psenner
+1

[VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1

2011-10-07 Thread Javier Sanchez
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1900 GMT 9-Oct 2011 > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... +1 --Original Message-- From: Stefan Bodewig To: Log4NET Dev Cc: gene...@logging.apach

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1

2011-10-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-10-06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1900 GMT 9-Oct 2011 > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... +1 Stefan

RE: ReviewBoard for log4net

2011-10-07 Thread Dominik Psenner
>for anybody who wants to give it a try, there now is a ReviewBoard group >at Nice! Unfortunately I won't be able to try this before Monday.