[jira] [Created] (LOG4NET-406) Log4Net breaks the Microsoft naming rules for namespaces

2013-11-20 Thread Michael Goldfinger (JIRA)
Michael Goldfinger created LOG4NET-406: -- Summary: Log4Net breaks the Microsoft naming rules for namespaces Key: LOG4NET-406 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-406 Project: Log4net

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4NET-406) Log4Net breaks the Microsoft naming rules for namespaces

2013-11-20 Thread Dominik Psenner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dominik Psenner updated LOG4NET-406: Fix Version/s: 1.3.0 > Log4Net breaks the Microsoft naming rules for namespaces >

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-406) Log4Net breaks the Microsoft naming rules for namespaces

2013-11-20 Thread Dominik Psenner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13827613#comment-13827613 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-406: - This is a API breaking change and we m

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4NET-406) Log4Net breaks the Microsoft naming rules for namespaces

2013-11-20 Thread Dominik Psenner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13827613#comment-13827613 ] Dominik Psenner edited comment on LOG4NET-406 at 11/20/13 1:05 PM:

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 1.2.13 based on RC3

2013-11-20 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1 checked formalities, but didn't interpret the content b/c lack of windows :-) One no blocker which I just saw: the KEYS file is included in the dist. Shouldn't it be left out? Cheers On 18 Nov 2013, at 6:21, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, three times is a charm. :-) Changes over RC2 is

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 1.2.13 based on RC3

2013-11-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-11-21, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > +1 > checked formalities, but didn't interpret the content b/c lack of > windows :-) thanks. > One no blocker which I just saw: the KEYS file is included in the > dist. Shouldn't it be left out? I think we've always done it that way in log4net and I

[RESULT] Release Log4Net 1.2.13 based on RC3

2013-11-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
So I count three +1s by Dominik, Christian and myself with no other votes. As usual I'll publish the distro and give the mirrors some time to catch up before sending out the announcement and updating the site. Stefan

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 1.2.13 based on RC3

2013-11-20 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On 21 Nov 2013, at 8:15, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2013-11-21, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> +1 > >> checked formalities, but didn't interpret the content b/c lack of >> windows :-) > > thanks. > >> One no blocker which I just saw: the KEYS file is included in the >> dist. Shouldn't it be left