AW: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-05 Thread Dominik Psenner
That's exactly what I had pointed out in the original thread. :-) >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: gert.drie...@telenet.be [mailto:gert.drie...@telenet.be] >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2014 22:15 >An: Log4NET Dev >Betreff: Re: Thoughts on 1.3 > >Hey Miljenko, > >I don't think it makes s

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-05 Thread gert . driesen
Hey Miljenko, I don't think it makes sense to create a separate "client-profile" version. MS has already abandoned this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc656912(v=vs.110).aspx Perhaps you were referring to a portable class library ? Cheers, Gert - Oorspronkelijk bericht - Van:

Build failed in Jenkins: log4net-trunk-tests #36

2014-02-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: [bodewig] typo in path, found by Rob Chartier - closes #8 -- [...truncated 382 lines...] [csc]

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-418) Recursive read lock acquisitions not allowed in this mode.

2014-02-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13892521#comment-13892521 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-418: I agree this shouldn't happen but it see