[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-428) Sysinternals Process Monitor appender

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14716164#comment-14716164 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-428: - Can you think of a unit test that ensu

Re: FW: [NuGet Gallery] Message for owners of the package 'log4net'

Hi Jiri! Glad to read you! Your response is great news to us and we would like to get more involved with releasing nuget packages. Still there are some questions, though: * Is your package on nuget in any way customized? * What steps have to be done to release a log4net package on nuget? We are

Re: Log4net 2.0

I do not, I simply emailed him via the NuGet package page for log4net. I will forward to you off list. > On Aug 26, 2015, at 11:45 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > > On 26 Aug 2015 6:05 pm, "Jeremiah Gowdy" > wrote: > > > > Following up on this, I contacted the packa

RE: Log4net 2.0

On 26 Aug 2015 5:22 pm, "Walden H. Leverich" wrote: > > > … the syslog appender is also a very useful appender for mixed shops. > > > > I agree wholeheartedly. The syslog appender is an integral part of our production environment. > > > > I also think you need to reconsider massive breaking change

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-473) Option for file extension in SmtpPickupDirAppender

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14715317#comment-14715317 ] Albin Sunnanbo commented on LOG4NET-473: Sorry for being sloppy and not providing

Re: Log4net 2.0

On 26 Aug 2015 6:05 pm, "Jeremiah Gowdy" wrote: > > Following up on this, I contacted the package maintainer and they said they are willing to transfer ownership to the log4net project. Thats great news. Do you happen to know him in person? > >> On Aug 26, 2015, at 8:15 AM, jerem...@gowdy.me wro

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-472) Contribution of BurstFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14715312#comment-14715312 ] Albin Sunnanbo commented on LOG4NET-472: I have implemented a leaky algorithm now

Re: Log4net 2.0

Following up on this, I contacted the package maintainer and they said they are willing to transfer ownership to the log4net project. > On Aug 26, 2015, at 8:15 AM, jerem...@gowdy.me wrote: > > If we can't force the owner of the nuget log4net package to work with us, why > not package it as log

RE: Log4net 2.0

> … the syslog appender is also a very useful appender for mixed shops. I agree wholeheartedly. The syslog appender is an integral part of our production environment. I also think you need to reconsider massive breaking changes to the API. If you’re going to force me to visit lots of code point

Re: Log4net 2.0

If we can't force the owner of the nuget log4net package to work with us, why not package it as log4net official or apache-log4net. I don't get why packaging is off topic for the release of a .NET library. If we are seeking to increase the user base, I would think an official package in the pa

Re: Log4net 2.0

Hi again, I wanted this discussion to stay open for a week and that time is over now. For now I'll try to answer questions and clarify a few things so that you get another chance to raise your voice. > Will the code be compatible with the current version? The API should stay more or less the sam