I agree. The user has to be aware of that special file but I wouldn't make
it "switchable" because it implicitly limits the available configurations in
other places and the user probably does not know. We have a similar magic
toggle in the current RFA which is named "staticLogFileName". That toggle
Good Morning,
I understand your point. That would be exactly how the current RFA behaves.
However, people are lazy and when something doesn't work they are first
frustrated and then they may throw the framework over board or ask silly
questions. The latter happens about once every month. It is
> Another issue that I just remembered now is that currently there's no way
to
> roll empty files on date/time boundaries. Rolling only happens when a log
> event is generated. If there's no log event, files won't be rolled. Thus
we
> should investigate if we should implement the appender as a buf
See the inlines.. I've stripped whatever's no longer interesting.
>> Another issue that I just remembered now is that currently there's no
>> way to roll empty files on date/time boundaries. Rolling only happens
>> when a log event is generated. If there's no log event, files won't be
>> rolled. T
[good idea :-D]
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
>Gesendet: Montag, 12. August 2013 10:07
>An: Log4NET Dev
>Betreff: Ideas for a new RollingFileAppender
>
>[just changing the subject :-)]
>
>On 2013-08-12, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
>> Yesterday it
