>> Thought of that too, but I decided to let it be in UTF8 cause its the
most
>> compatible format nowadays whereas ASCII is somewhat antique. What do
>you
>> think?
>
>IIUC ASCII would have been the implicit body encoding for log4net <
>1.2.12 so when looking for a backwards compatible default thi
>On 2013-11-14, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
>>> I'm not sure whether setting the encoding to UTF8 triggers some sort of
>>> different handling inside of the framweork's SMTP code even if the test
>>> was pure ASCII. If it doesn't, then I'm fine with UTF8.
>
>> and checking a few of my Gmail's mails i
