On 2011-09-15, Roy Chastain wrote:
> Hopefully someone knows the answer so I do not have to search through
> the code.
I did a quick grepp through the code as I wasn't sure myself.
> If a configuration for an appender is activated, then changed and
> activated again, is there a new instance of t
Hopefully someone knows the answer so I do not have to search through
the code.
If a configuration for an appender is activated, then changed and
activated again, is there a new instance of the appender class or is the
old instance reused?
-
