On 2011-08-21, Roy Chastain wrote:
> We must have "many" conditionals. As you noted 2.0 is not a superset of
> 1.1 and 4.0 is not a superset of 2.0. Because of CAS and other issues,
> 2.0 and 4.0 may be in direct opposition.
Agreed.
> 3.0 and 3.5 are indeed supersets of 2.0, but I doubt their im
We must have "many" conditionals. As you noted 2.0 is not a superset of
1.1 and 4.0 is not a superset of 2.0. Because of CAS and other issues,
2.0 and 4.0 may be in direct opposition.
3.0 and 3.5 are indeed supersets of 2.0, but I doubt their importance as
conditionals. I would only see them as i
