On 2013-11-06, Nick Williams wrote:
> LOG4NET-393 is causing us some problems at $work. It's fixed as of
> 1.3.0, which doesn't appear to be released yet. Is there an expected
> date for it to be released, and if not what can I do to help make this
> happen?
If you need anything fast, then it is
Hey Stefan
Since LOG4NET-393 is a blocker for people who work a lot with lambda
expressions and right now we have absolutely no idea as of when 1.3 will be
ready we might better release 1.2.13 containing the fix for the issue.
Cheers
2013/11/6 Stefan Bodewig
> On 2013-11-06, Nick Williams wro
On 2013-11-06, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> Since LOG4NET-393 is a blocker for people who work a lot with lambda
> expressions and right now we have absolutely no idea as of when 1.3 will be
> ready we might better release 1.2.13 containing the fix for the issue.
Yeah, no problem with that, I'll try
have preferred to see the old strong name key shipped, but
that's a different issue...
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: 06 November 2013 17:28
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: Re: Log4Net 1.3.0
On 2013-11-06, Nick Williams wrote:
> LOG4NET-393 is causin
Maybe we can craft some other small and easy fixes that we can ship with
1.2.13.
2013/11/6 Stefan Bodewig
> On 2013-11-06, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
> > Since LOG4NET-393 is a blocker for people who work a lot with lambda
> > expressions and right now we have absolutely no idea as of when 1.3 wi
27;s a different issue...
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
> Sent: 06 November 2013 17:28
> To: Log4NET Dev
> Subject: Re: Log4Net 1.3.0
>
> On 2013-11-06, Nick Williams wrote:
>
> > LOG4NET-393 is causing
On 2013-11-06, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> Maybe we can craft some other small and easy fixes that we can ship with
> 1.2.13.
Oh, even though I've already tagged the sources in svn don't let that
hold you back, tags are cheap. Look through JIRA if you see anything
you feel fits and we'll go from th
On 2013-11-07, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>> On 2013-11-06, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>>> Maybe we can craft some other small and easy fixes that we can ship with
>>> 1.2.13.
>> Oh, even though I've already tagged the sources in svn don't let that
>> hold you back, tags are cheap. Look through JIRA if
>> If there is, I'd be happy to wait anouther week, otherwise I'd proceed
>> with the release process and rather try to get trunk back into a
>> releasable state for a quick 1.3.0 afterwards.
> Not anytime soon, sorry.
Understood. I'll have to re-tag anyway as my fix for what became
LOG4NET-404
On 2013-11-07, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I'll try to find some time for a short triage and come back.
Found one old bug that looked easy and relatively safe to fix, so I did
just that. I don't intend to put more changes into the release myself.
Unless anybody else wants to do additional work, I'l
On 2015-08-10, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote:
> What’s the release schedule for log4net 1.3.0 look like?
I'm afraid we've managed to move us in state where trunk isn't ready to
get released and we don't find the time to finish it. And even if we
did, we wouldn't be creating the log4net people want today
11 matches
Mail list logo
